*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Hi David,


Could not stop myself having to comment on this (must be known 😊)


Logic dictates that if you have 2 individual statements explaining one event 
then they are either both false or just one of them is true, they cannot both 
be true. Since after reading Trom for a couple of times I understood most of 
it’s meaning means for me that your statement is false?


If you read a book about someone’s experience of travelling all over the world 
it will not mean that you completely understand that person’s reality.

The content of TROM explaining everything behind postulates is a difficult 
subject to immediately grasp, it is describing a high truth based reality, you 
have to do the exercises and gain experience and at some point read it again. 
Only in that manner will you at some point fully duplicate what is being 
communicated in the TROM manual. TROM is written from a state of truth that for 
most people is hard to understand and thus hard to duplicate.


Note: Have you ever seen a person after reading the Tao te Ching, Zen, Koans 
that they immediately became enlightened? Some of them even had to be beaten 
with a stick many times before they had that ah ha moment.


Jurgen





From: David Pelly
Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎January‎ ‎30‎, ‎2014 ‎10‎:‎03‎ ‎AM
To: TROM list







Brian,


The idea that someone  should have to read something more than two or three 
times (very maximum four or five times) to understand it,  or rather as in the 
case of TROM, begin to understand it, is stupid and insane (never mind 10 times 
or 40 times).




High quality writings are such that the text flows and emotes it's meaning, it 
is alive,  it emotes what the author wants the reader to know and understand,  
and does it clearly.  

The meaning, the intention  jumps of the page and flows into the reader. 



If anyone should know how to do that, it is an  accomplished and competent 
scientologist, one worth his salt.







TROM emotes Dennis' very aberrated case.







David 










Hello TROMers,

My name's Brian and I have been doing TROM on and off now for a few years
(more off than on unfortunately.)

I was a Scientologist for 30+ years until 2007 when I announced my departure
from the Co$. I am trained to class V as an auditor, done a couple L's (best
auditing I ever had.)

I've gotten a start on a book on TROM that I hope will present the subject
in a simple and straightforward manner with no Scn lingo and examples that
cover many questions asked here by new-comers.

I must say that reading the TROM manual now over 10 times through has been
quite useful (and listening/reading all of Dennis' talks.) If any of you
have questions or disagreements (that'd be you Dave P.) you should just take
another pass or 5 through the materials until you do get it. I have not
found any mistakes in this tech as presented by Dennis. It lines up with
perfect logical consistency.

It's good to see the list come alive like it has in the last weeks. It's
gotten me more motivated to get cranking on level 3.

Namaste,

Brian

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

 
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to