*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Thank you Roberto.

We'll said.

Pete

Sent from my iPad

> On Jan 31, 2014, at 10:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> David
>  
> I did a little research on you and found you on a computer forum. The
> pattern of your communication there was a deja vu to me: You asked
> a question and then attacked those who, out of good will, answered.
> (I can supply the links.)
>  
> I care for TROM and this forum, that's my motive. Your comments are
> invalidating and they give newcomers an excuse for not trying to
> understand TROM. They think: Ahhhh Dennies lies - no wonder I do not
> understand it...
>  
> I quote your own words from the forum mentioned above:
> "... Relatively speaking, I am far from a fully normal fully competent
> person, but I am a lot better than I used to be. ..."
>  
> Your excuse there, as on this forum was "having had a difficult
> childhood". As level 3 gets a person in peace with its past, this
> should give you a hint to your current level.
>  
> Doing TROM is the way to understand it and to benefit from it, not
> talking about it and the world in general and all those other beautiful
> methods that we also could talk about and and bla and bla and isn't
> it interesting and bla and bla and bla.
>  
> So, to end on a positive note for you, I must grant you the satisfaction
> that you won a good couple of games against me:
>  
> - I just used the time that I had planned for a session to battle hard with
> the English language (I am German speaking) and write this post.
> - I feel bad about having criticized and exposed you.
> - I feel quite a bit ARC-broken with quite a few posters on this forum,
> because I expected them to spot your intentions a long time ago.
>  
> You see, against me you are winning all the way.
>  
> Roberto
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: David Pelly [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 12:53 PM
> To: The Resolution of Mind list
> Subject: Re: [TROM1] Duplication (In reply to David)
>  
> Juergen,
> 
> There may well be some very high truths in TROM.
> 
> But there is no  bona fide  supporting evidence that such truth in TROM  
> really exists.
> 
>  Bonafide: means that there is  no evidence that is free of delusional 
> thinking, free of deceit and bullshit)
> 
> Any evidence there is does not  stand up to scrutiny.
> 
> If there are any high level truths in TROM they are embedded amongst a lot of 
> aberration and bullshit.
> 
> Dennis is the first evidence of his bullshit. He was still totally fucked up 
> until he died, at the relatively young age of 67.
> 
>  
> 
> The only reason I am here and trying to do TROM is to put it through the 
> scrutiny of the claims,  to see if any truths of any kind can be salvaged or 
> gleaned from the other wise heap of aberration and bullshit.
> 
> If there are indeed any truths amidst the bullshit, and the  truths  
> contained there in,  are indeed complete enough that they can be worked into 
> a practical gradient  and made into workable process to resolve my case or 
> others cases, so be it.
> 
> That would be an ideal case scenario.
> 
> Failing that,  I would be content to find some useful morsels and add them to 
> what ever else I could find,  to make a practical or doable solo process to 
> assist future initiates that may come along.
> 
> I would not be happy with myself,   if I did not do what ever I could,   that 
> was within my means, to prevent others from going through the pain, agony,  
> frustration,  and bullshit  that I have so far, experienced  with TROM, since 
> I began.
> 
> My first stab at TROM was when I bought the hard cover TROM  book  in about 
> 98, from a fz magazine,  which after trying for three yrs to read it, and 
> understand it, I gave up and threw it in the dumpster. 
> 
> I decided that the author lacked common sense, lacked good communication 
> skills,   was totally incoherent, incongruent,  irrational, unreasonable, 
> illogical and  insane.
> 
> What I really find disconcerting is that you and others on this list tend to 
> deify Dennis, and argue to defend his insanity.
> 
> It takes a  very feeble minded person to deify another human being, 
> especially an insane one.
> 
> Actually it takes a person with no mind at all to do that.
> 
> Because you have no mind, no common sense, no ability to reason and think for 
> yourself, 
> 
>  no critical thinking skills,  no bullshit detector, not able able to discern 
> right from wrong, or have  a very poor ability to do so, 
> 
> someone else can easily suck you  into adopting their aberrated mind and take 
> control of you.
> 
> That happens in all cult groups.
> 
>  
> 
> David
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jurgen Kluft <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> 
> Hi David,
>  
> Could not stop myself having to comment on this (must be known 😊)
>  
> Logic dictates that if you have 2 individual statements explaining one event 
> then they are either both false or just one of them is true, they cannot both 
> be true. Since after reading Trom for a couple of times I understood most of 
> it’s meaning means for me that your statement is false?
>  
> If you read a book about someone’s experience of travelling all over the 
> world it will not mean that you completely understand that person’s reality.
> The content of TROM explaining everything behind postulates is a difficult 
> subject to immediately grasp, it is describing a high truth based reality, 
> you have to do the exercises and gain experience and at some point read it 
> again. Only in that manner will you at some point fully duplicate what is 
> being communicated in the TROM manual. TROM is written from a state of truth 
> that for most people is hard to understand and thus hard to duplicate.
>  
> Note: Have you ever seen a person after reading the Tao te Ching, Zen, Koans 
> that they immediately became enlightened? Some of them even had to be beaten 
> with a stick many times before they had that ah ha moment.
>  
> Jurgen
>  
> From: David Pelly
> Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎January‎ ‎30‎, ‎2014 ‎10‎:‎03‎ ‎AM
> To: TROM list
>  
> Brian,
> 
> The idea that someone  should have to read something more than two or three 
> times (very maximum four or five times) to understand it,  or rather as in 
> the case of TROM, begin to understand it, is stupid and insane (never mind 10 
> times or 40 times).
> 
> High quality writings are such that the text flows and emotes it's meaning, 
> it is alive,  it emotes what the author wants the reader to know and 
> understand,  and does it clearly.  
> 
> The meaning, the intention  jumps of the page and flows into the reader.
> 
> If anyone should know how to do that, it is an  accomplished and competent 
> scientologist, one worth his salt.
> 
>  
> TROM emotes Dennis' very aberrated case.
> 
>  
> 
> David
>  
> 
>  
> Hello TROMers,
> 
> My name's Brian and I have been doing TROM on and off now for a few years
> (more off than on unfortunately.)
> 
> I was a Scientologist for 30+ years until 2007 when I announced my departure
> from the Co$. I am trained to class V as an auditor, done a couple L's (best
> auditing I ever had.)
> 
> I've gotten a start on a book on TROM that I hope will present the subject
> in a simple and straightforward manner with no Scn lingo and examples that
> cover many questions asked here by new-comers.
> 
> I must say that reading the TROM manual now over 10 times through has been
> quite useful (and listening/reading all of Dennis' talks.) If any of you
> have questions or disagreements (that'd be you Dave P.) you should just take
> another pass or 5 through the materials until you do get it. I have not
> found any mistakes in this tech as presented by Dennis. It lines up with
> perfect logical consistency.
> 
> It's good to see the list come alive like it has in the last weeks. It's
> gotten me more motivated to get cranking on level 3.
> 
> Namaste,
> 
> Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to