************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi Colleen First comes desire then comes creation (be known) then comes desire to know what you created then comes reasons why you did it.
This is the sequence that Dennis presents. So first was desire but the first postulate was to be known only after that was done was there anything to know. This sequence is what you are describing in your statement followed by " the being wanted "To > Know" better his creation,". Obviously the being did the creating and then wanted to know what he had done. So Dennis was right. The first postulate was "be known". Sincerely Pete > Hello, Pete, > > If one looks at the most basic incident possible, a type of first > separation to create persistency of the creation, the being wanted "To > Know" better his creation, and all aspects of the goal set were put in > place, and at this time I feel the first -- if there was a first -- goal > was "To Know". He had to create something and do a reflexive > not-know/not-be-known My current understanding is that the prime > being/viewpoint was less interested in being known by its creation as it > was in knowing its creation better. I would not swear to this on a stack > of Bibles and is only a subjective viewing with hopefully some logic. It > seems to me what you are talking about is the first being that experienced > or had the consideration of being the effect. I see a "wall" between these > two -- a wall which gets broken down using practices in Trom. Based on > what I've seen so far I'm sticking with "To Know" as the general descriptor. > > colleen
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
