*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
I once thought the theory describes the real world.  I even confused the theory 
and the real world.
I was looking through the lens of my intentions and limitations of my own 
reality
 Now I realized my mistake. 

16.08.2014, 22:59, "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>:
> Send Trom mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Trom digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. RE Just As is. KNOW! (Colleen K. Peltomaa)
>    2. Re: Feedback on "Must be Known" (Paul Tipon)
>    3. Re: Trom Digest, Vol 121, Issue 26 (Svoboda Vladimir)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:46:16 -0400
> From: "Colleen K. Peltomaa" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [TROM1] RE Just As is. KNOW!
> Message-ID:
>         <caf4m2-3jn-gwaokhf9+tgeq3m0tkwma7ousu-hsr2ds5vpo...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thank you, Alberto.   You remind me there is compulsion and sensation
> attached to the goal set of To Know and To be Known.  Could KNOW also be
> AWARE?
>
> colleen
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20140816/cb850084/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:53:00 -0700
> From: Paul Tipon <[email protected]>
> To: The Resolution of Mind  list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [TROM1] Feedback on "Must be Known"
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
>         DelSp="yes"
>
> Hi Pete and All,
>
> I would like to clarify the following.  When one is looking at the
> terms 'To .....' and 'To Be ..... , those are not the postulates.
> Those terms refer to postulates that will make those terms an effect
> and are a goal to be achieved.
>
> Also always keep in mind that 'Know' and 'Not Know are the postulates
> that you and everyone else are using and apply only to that one
> individual that is postulating that and no one else.  So for one to
> Postulate that another, others will 'Know' or 'Not Know' is wrong, an
> oxymoron for one does not make postulates for anyone but his self.
> To say that I postulate Fred will know or not know is false, a false
> idea.  Not a postulate for Fred at all.  One can only put out an
> effect for Fred to observe.  If he doesn't 'Know' or decides to 'Not
> Know', one can put out another effect out which involves force such
> as a tap on the shoulder, pointing, shouting and various other more
> forceful effects.  One should always be careful not to harm or kill
> Fred in the process or cause Fred to decide to counter-force in some
> fashion and react to the force rather than the effect.  If that
> occurs you don't have the subject of Know going on but of force/
> counter-force and the effect of the force/counter-force.
>
> One of the biggest problems going on with this discussion thread is
> that communication is not full, adequate and complete.  This
> discussion is not getting to the correct focal point and therefore
> not coming to any kind of a truth and just keeps going around and
> around.  It is not the languages fault but that of those not
> thoroughly applying the language to correctly and fully get an idea
> across.  Such does not allow a truth to be recognized.  It's just
> that the truth is not being communicated but something else being
> incomplete and easily connoted as something else other than the truth
> that is being communicated.
>
> I am not doing this to make Pete wrong in any way.  I just want to
> clarify and point out that the statement is incomplete and possibly
> mis-leading for by not being complete, it opens the door to other,
> different ideas than the truth that is being communicated.  As an
> example, see the below in red and green.
>
> There can be only postulates which create an effect, an effect in the
> physical or non-physical universe.  A postulate that does something
> to another spiritual entity does not exist but may seem to, depending
> on what another spiritual entity decides to do (effect postulated in
> response to an effect) about the effect being observed.
>
> This is a given, an absolute that one must forever and always be
> aware of if one ever wishes to be a Master Game Player or no game
> player at all.  I hope this helps.
>
> Paul, keep on TROMming
>
> On Aug 15, 2014, at 6:34 AM, Pete Mclaughlin wrote:
>>  Hi Jesus
>>  The words used to describe the postulates are not the postulates.
>>  The words are only labels that we use so we can communicate about
>>  the postulates.
>>
>>  In reading over your statements I see that you are saying the to be
>>  known and to know postulates are all about creating stuff as in
>>  inanimate objects.
>>  You end with a confusion on whether to know is actually the
>>  creative postulate.
>>
>>  Dennis did spend a lot of time talking about creating effects in
>>  the TROM manual and this is misleading.
>>
>>  The cognition I had that started my effort to change the label for
>>  the basic goals package to "to be known" was that creating effects
>>  is only being done so that I can get others to know that I am here.
>
> This last phrase in green is more appropriately stated by saying ...
> 'others have been presented an effect which they may observe and from
> that observation decide to 'Know' or decide to 'Not Know' that I am
> here.  There is no other power or ability that I or anyone else
> possesses other than to cause an effect which others may or may not
> observe.  This is true for any and all universes when discussing
> individuals, spiritual or physical or whatever.
>>  This is the most important thing to learn from the level 5 of TROM.
>>  I CREATE EFFECTS SO OTHERS WILL NOTICE I AM HERE.
>
> ... have the opportunity to notice [via the effect I present that] ...
>>  I want to be known and I want others to know me.
>>
>>  Creating stuff doesn't matter except as it serves this purpose.
>>
>>  So "to be known" means I want to be known by others. This is the
>>  most important goal and why it is the purpose behind all the other
>>  goals a person has.
>>
>>  Does this make it clear why I want to change the label for the
>>  basic goals package to "to be known" and do you now agree the
>>  change would be helpful?
>>
>>  Sincerely
>>  Pete
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20140816/2811ad31/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 22:59:19 +0400
> From: Svoboda Vladimir <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [TROM1] Trom Digest, Vol 121, Issue 26
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20140816/c6135565/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trom mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
> End of Trom Digest, Vol 121, Issue 29
> *************************************
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to