************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Hi Ant I agree that emotions were obvious but Hubbard listed them in order and taught them to auditors as a gage of progress on the case. So he "developed" the scales which ended up in the science of survival as measures of case condition and gages of vase progress.
I think we are in agreement here just defining terms. Sincerely Pete Sincerely Pete Sent from my iPad > On Sep 6, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Ant Phillips <[email protected]> wrote: > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > At 23:17 06-09-2014, Pete Mclaughlin wrote: >> While Dennis does mention the CDEI in the books he does not mention the >> emotional tone scale. The emotional tone scale was developed by LRH to >> guide pre-E-meter auditors in assessing the PC's progress in an incident. >> TROM does not need that or an e-meter to guide the solo auditor through an >> incident. > > I understood that the Tone scale was observed by Ron (and others) in running > engrams in early Dianetics. It appears in its earliest version in Dianetics: > Modern Science of Mental Health. It may seem "nit-picking" but I do not think > it was "developed" - it stood out like a sore thumb while you ran an engram. > (see the book) > All best wishes, > > Ant > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
