*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
I am reading Filbert's excalibur and just came across the following, which
is very similar in context to my last post to the TROM list:

(Note: My main point is the underlined parts.)


Quote Filbert:

An individual's ignorance is generally the result of living in a culture
rampant with tremendous ignorance, thus people trying to study, learn and
understand Scientology and Dianetics are alluded by two almost impossible
factors. They are already ignorant and already aberrated. They aren't up to
knowing that, much less suspecting it, much less perceiving it. In other
words, people are ignorant and they are aberrated; that is, if given an
opportunity of going from A to B, they will go to C instead.

One logical path out of this paradox is the multiple-pass approach on a
subject matter clearing up the aberration and the ignorance as one goes.
You just read the material over and over. As far as a complete and accurate
assimilation of the technology, this path would not work until all this
aberration is gone.

The bootstrap-limited approach (teaching people about Scientology and
Dianetics prior to them having all of their aberration run off) has proven
historically unworkable. Not only because people do the wrong things,* but
there is no way they will ever rise above being dumb and ignorant and
prefer truth and sanity until their aberrations are gone. *



*(This is why  an auditor cannot process anyone above his own level of
aberration (at the very best). In some  cases not any where near, and in
worst case scenarios; not at all.it <http://all.it> depends on the contents
of the case.*

*Books also emote the author's aberrations.  D.Pelly)*


They would simply see no point in it. These particular ideas (in fact every
idea in this book) can be subjected to objective tests and be found to be
true.

The model way or the ideal way happens to be the only workable way. Someone
had to have their case completed first before they could understand and
apply the technology.

This oversimplification is only one in the issue of why no one can
understand and apply the technology with any degree of consistency,
accuracy and success. *The other issue is, in spite of these determinates
of why data can't be transmitted, knowing the materials objectively has no
relationship to understanding*. Once the information is known personally,
it can be applied. Knowingness is a personal matter. Operating on another
person's knowingness has very limited workability. It is only valuable to
absorb, digest and work with other peoples knowingness in order to develop
ones own.


*There is no record of all this information being assimilated and developed
as a personal knowingness within  the existence of the church or the study
of the religion. These three determinates: (1) peoples affinity and
unawareness for remaining aberrated, (2) their own unawareness of their
high degree of ignorance, and (3) their complete lack of any personal
knowingness -- add up to failure on not only the average student, but every
student that has adventured on this particular road of truth.*

99% of something is not a whole. Even if someone had attained 90%
understanding, which some Public Relations Officer somewhere might promote
as an idea, would be a complete asininity.

There is no way anyone could have absorbed more than 10% because there are
no records (or evidence) within the church (or even outside the church) of
anyone ever running extremely high aberrations off a case. (Or even running
off moderate amounts of aberrations off a case)

End of quote.

One major problem is that scientology  has no cure for the "asshole
disease".

Nor have I found any other alternative spin off tech have the cure.


David
_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to