*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Hi david, dont forget the other half of prevented, but forced too.

Forced to be, do and have. And forced to postulate. :)

On Sunday, 11 September 2016, The Resolution of Mind list <
[email protected]> wrote:

> *************
> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
> ************
> Hi,
>
> Re. TROM L5 vss. LRH's GPM handling:
>
> There is much differences plus a few similarities technically.
> Running GPMs according Hubbard's tech. requires excellent
> metering plus excellent guess-work on the auditor's part in order
> to arrange a valid line-plot. Not necessarily good preconditions
> for a newby ;-)
> Comparably the inherent logic of the Postulate Failure Cycle Chart
> (PFCC) appears like the beauty and precision of a swiss clockwork
> compared to a cuckoo clock.
> One would not intermix parts of each other.
> The question how one would run GPMs in TROM is similar sensible as a
> book-one auditor asking: "How would you run an Engram with NED".
> The higher level tech. does it all.
>
> Re. Demanding to "Lower the Gradient" (of course for the good of
> future readers - how ironic, to say the least):
>
> Seemingly the purposes and application of "Gradient Scales" are
> grossly misunderstood.
> Let's say someone is unable to understand the beauty of the fresco
> at the Sistine Chapel and therefore - in order to lower the gradient -
> demands that it may be painted over e.g. in manga-style.
> Or someone trying to understand formulas describing Einsteins theories
> in higher calculus demanding to rewrite the work in terms of elementary
> school mathematics - which, of course, renders it's usability more or
> less worthless.
>
> In society it is - unfortunately - common to lower gradients in order to
> establish compatibility with the lowest grade of ability and intelligence
> available.
> Just another great example for the often cited "Dwindling Downward Spiral".
>
> The correct handling is exactly the other way around:
> Use the Gradient Scale to bring the newbie's up to a sufficient
> level of understanding so that he gains the ability to assimilate the
> material,
> be it art, technology, life, ...
> You see the paradox?
>
> You see that this has nothing to do with be, do or have or whatsoever? But
> has
> to do with regaining the ability _to know_ (which is not the digestion of
> data by
> rote, but manifests automatically in application, which in turn establishes
> a doingness).
>
> Re. Wanting it all predigested and served on the silver plate ...
>
> because the state of "newby" establishes a right to such a request.
> Well, this is just another of those aberrations in our socialistic
> societies. It is so deep seated in many people that they get extremely
> upset when one would require them to be cause or exert their right to
> free will. They rather prefer to occupy the viewpoint of effect, for
> convenience sake, not at all realizing that this is the straight highway to
> slavery. This is the funny part of it. Less funny is it when those
> individuals, more or less covertly, try to attack others or the works
> of others who are not in agreement with the good-meaning wish for: "An
> affect
> viewpoint for anyone!".
>
> Interesting enough, that those same people are always good for tips and
> advices when it comes to work that has to be done by others, by reason
> of: "I'm a newby, can not do it, you do it for me".
>
> Re. Source materials and their protection:
>
> We've seen that happening times after times. E.g. the main spiritual
> works of Christianity, known as the Bible. Originally it was a much larger
> work. Most of it got lost, was altered, rewritten, perverted one way or
> other.
> Of course all for the sake of lowering the gradient in order to make it
> accessible for even the most silly. How noble.
>
> Same just happens right now with the books of LRH. It starts small scale
> with correcting punctuation marks and ends with ...?
>
> It is of course perfectly legitimate if someone writes a (critical) essay
> _about_ a certain piece of source material. Or an extension in a separate
> volume unequivocal marked as something which has a new source which is
> responsible for the work and who therefore owns the (c)-right for that.
> Otherwise future generations will inevitably loose sight of the real
> sources.
>
> All of this is not germane to the question if the sources or their works
> are correct or they were right or wrong. It is not the appropriate handling
> for any errors or wrongnesses in the materials, to make any changes.
> (B.t.w. it is an impossibility that whatever material was originated from
> humans
> is perfectly error free. This would violate "LOGIC 6: ABSOLUTES ARE
> UNOBTAINABLE".)
>
> I'm glad that Pete made a clear statement in that regard with the TROM
> materials.
> Dennis' work seems to be in good good hands so far.
>
> Re. Being a Newby:
>
> All of us once had been, one way or other, beginners in various fields.
> The steepnesses of learning curves are so many as individuals existed and
> will exist. It requires some work - not necessarily hard work, because it's
> interesting and fun - but work paired with persistence (might be more than
> just
> one lifetime) - in order to come up to a level of awareness and personal
> development which allows the individual to successfully tackle his problems
> in life. This alone is a great step toward freedom because one no longer
> depends on the immediate help of others. This attainment is not for free.
> It required me many hours of study, processing and money. But I can tell
> that
> it was/is worth every single minute and Euro I've spent.
>
> You might need a competent auditor to get started. You might need 40+ hours
> of "Reach & Withdraw" on books, the Student Hat course, or whatever. But
> do not
> expect that someone rewrites any materials for you in order to meet your
> "gradient"
> and then make a rewrite for the next David, ... that could go on ad
> infinitum.
> It would not benefit you at all.
>
> Regards
> Robin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 06:08:21 +0200, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Send TROM mailing list submissions to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         [email protected]
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of TROM digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>    1. Re: Be do have///// PS (The Resolution of Mind list)
>>    2. Re: Be do have///// PS (The Resolution of Mind list)
>>    3. Re: Be do have///// PS (The Resolution of Mind list)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:37:55 -0400
>> From: The Resolution of Mind  list <[email protected]>
>> To: The Resolution of Mind list <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [TROM1] Be do have///// PS
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Pete,
>>
>> the reason I asked you to add be do have to the junior goals package was
>> not so much for the people on the list, but for future users of the
>> process.
>>
>> It is unlikely that anyone would ever figure that out.
>>
>> And it is of primary importance.
>>
>>
>> It is a huge step in processing.
>>
>>
>> More than half a case could be processed on  be do have.
>>
>>
>> It is actually much higher than a junior goals package.
>>
>>
>> It is extremely necessary to add it to the book.
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:34 PM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> *************
>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>> ************
>>>
>>> Pete,
>>>
>>> you are not seeing TROM from a newbie's point of view.
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> *************
>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>> ************
>>>>
>>>> HI David
>>>>   What is important to resolve a case is whatever is important to the
>>>> individual.  It is best to leave TROM as it is and discuss individual
>>>> cases
>>>> here on the email list.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely
>>>> Pete McLaughlin
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 5:24 AM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *************
>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>> ************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pete,
>>>>
>>>> Prevented from knowing, therefore can't know.
>>>>
>>>> Prevented from postulating, therefore can't postulate
>>>>
>>>> Prevented from being, therefore can't be.
>>>>
>>>> Prevented from doing, therefore can't do
>>>>
>>>> Prevented from having, therefore can't have,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are dominant for me  in that sequence,   and I am sure for many others,
>>>> if not everyone,
>>>>
>>>> at least to some degree.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You should explain them and add them to the junior goals list,  as
>>>> editor's edits or additions.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS: You did make some significant improvements in :
>>>>
>>>> http://tromhelp.com/Books1/06TROMTherapyManual6x9.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> but more has to be done.
>>>>
>>>> I know it is hard work, and you can only articulate so much at one time.
>>>>
>>>> You need to take a break for a couple of yrs and then take another run
>>>> at
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The gradient has to be lowered.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TROM mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TROM mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TROM mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20160910
>> /7ea02bc6/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 19:14:55 +0200
>> From: The Resolution of Mind  list <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [TROM1] Be do have///// PS
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
>>
>> Is this David, David Pelly?
>> I am curious.
>>
>>
>> On 10-09-2016 17:37, The Resolution of Mind list wrote:
>>
>>> *************
>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>> ************
>>>
>>>
>>> Pete,
>>>
>>> the reason I asked you to add be do have to the junior goals package
>>> was not so much for the people on the list, but for future users of
>>> the process.
>>>
>>> It is unlikely that anyone would ever figure that out.
>>>
>>> And it is of primary importance.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is a huge step in processing.
>>>
>>>
>>> More than half a case could be processed on  be do have.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is actually much higher than a junior goals package.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is extremely necessary to add it to the book.
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:34 PM, The Resolution of Mind list
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     *************
>>>     The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
>>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     ************
>>>
>>>     Pete,
>>>
>>>     you are not seeing TROM from a newbie's point of view.
>>>
>>>
>>>     David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM, The Resolution of Mind list
>>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         *************
>>>         The following message is relayed to you by
>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         ************
>>>
>>>         HI David
>>>           What is important to resolve a case is whatever is important
>>>         to the individual.  It is best to leave TROM as it is and
>>>         discuss individual cases here on the email list.
>>>
>>>         Sincerely
>>>         Pete McLaughlin
>>>
>>>         Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>         On Sep 9, 2016, at 5:24 AM, The Resolution of Mind list
>>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         *************
>>>>         The following message is relayed to you by
>>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>         ************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Pete,
>>>>
>>>>         Prevented from knowing, therefore can't know.
>>>>
>>>>         Prevented from postulating, therefore can't postulate
>>>>
>>>>         Prevented from being, therefore can't be.
>>>>
>>>>         Prevented from doing, therefore can't do
>>>>
>>>>         Prevented from having, therefore can't have,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Are dominant for me  in that sequence,   and I am sure for
>>>>         many others, if not everyone,
>>>>
>>>>         at least to some degree.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         You should explain them and add them to the junior goals
>>>>         list,  as editor's edits or additions.
>>>>
>>>>         David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         PS: You did make some significant improvements in :
>>>>
>>>>         http://tromhelp.com/Books1/06TROMTherapyManual6x9.pdf
>>>>         <http://tromhelp.com/Books1/06TROMTherapyManual6x9.pdf>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         but more has to be done.
>>>>
>>>>         I know it is hard work, and you can only articulate so much
>>>>         at one time.
>>>>
>>>>         You need to take a break for a couple of yrs and then take
>>>>         another run at it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         The gradient has to be lowered.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         TROM mailing list
>>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>         http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>>         <http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom>
>>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         TROM mailing list
>>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>         http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>         <http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     TROM mailing list
>>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>     http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>     <http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TROM mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20160910
>> /c4927624/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 21:08:46 -0700
>> From: The Resolution of Mind  list <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [TROM1] Be do have///// PS
>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> David
>>  The editing I did to the TROM books was only to delete sentence
>> fragments, fix run on sentences add a table of contents, index and glossary.
>>
>> I did not rewrite or create new processes. That was all done by Dennis.
>>
>> I am not going to add any new material to the TROM books. They are what
>> Dennis created and will stay that way.
>>
>> If you see a compelling need to create some new processes for TROM then
>> you are welcome to write them up yourself and publish them.
>>
>> Sincerely
>> Pete McLaughlin
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2016, at 8:37 AM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> *************
>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>> ************
>>> Pete,
>>>
>>> the reason I asked you to add be do have to the junior goals package was
>>> not so much for the people on the list, but for future users of the process.
>>>
>>> It is unlikely that anyone would ever figure that out.
>>>
>>> And it is of primary importance.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is a huge step in processing.
>>>
>>>
>>> More than half a case could be processed on  be do have.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is actually much higher than a junior goals package.
>>>
>>>
>>> It is extremely necessary to add it to the book.
>>>
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:34 PM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> *************
>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>> ************
>>>>
>>>> Pete,
>>>>
>>>> you are not seeing TROM from a newbie's point of view.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> *************
>>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>>> ************
>>>>>
>>>>> HI David
>>>>>   What is important to resolve a case is whatever is important to the
>>>>> individual.  It is best to leave TROM as it is and discuss individual 
>>>>> cases
>>>>> here on the email list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely
>>>>> Pete McLaughlin
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 5:24 AM, The Resolution of Mind list <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *************
>>>>>> The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
>>>>>> ************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pete,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prevented from knowing, therefore can't know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prevented from postulating, therefore can't postulate
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prevented from being, therefore can't be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prevented from doing, therefore can't do
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prevented from having, therefore can't have,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are dominant for me  in that sequence,   and I am sure for many
>>>>>> others, if not everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> at least to some degree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should explain them and add them to the junior goals list,  as
>>>>>> editor's edits or additions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PS: You did make some significant improvements in :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://tromhelp.com/Books1/06TROMTherapyManual6x9.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but more has to be done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know it is hard work, and you can only articulate so much at one
>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need to take a break for a couple of yrs and then take another
>>>>>> run at it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The gradient has to be lowered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> TROM mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TROM mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TROM mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TROM mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20160910
>> /c9e03fcb/attachment.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TROM mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>>
>>
>> End of TROM Digest, Vol 143, Issue 9
>> ************************************
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TROM mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
>
_______________________________________________
TROM mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to