Glenn to DaveL - I have to stand by what I say in the subject line. BLAINEThere are certain Mormon doctrines Mormons don't teach until people are deep in their cult of a different Jesus.
SAYS THE BIBLE IS SOMETHING THAT BRINGS PEOPLE UNDER THE POWER OF SATAN (1
Nephi 13:29-30). AND HE USES 1 NEPHI TO BACK IT UP!!!
Again I say, Blaine let the cat out of the bag. Why would it take weeks and
weeks for him to deny this??????
Respond to the article I posted on TT. It sheds a lot of light on Mormon
deception/wisdom.
Glenn to DaveL - I have to stand by what I say in the subject line.; BLAINE SAYS THE BIBLE IS SOMETHING THAT BRINGS PEOPLE UNDER THE POWER OF SATAN (1 Nephi 13:29-30). AND HE USES 1 NEPHI TO BACK IT UP!!!
--- Begin Message ---Your message posting was rejected because the "<LYRIS-" header was detected in the body of the message you sent.This header is usually only included by automated email programs, such as "vacation" programs. For this reason, Lyris List Manager does not accept messages which contain this header, because it is highly likely that they are automated messages, and not appropriate for a mailing list. If you are receiving this message, it means that you accidentally set off this safeguard, by including the "<LYRIS-" text in your message. Please resubmit your email message, without including the headers of a previous message (specifically, do not include the Message-Id line). --- For your convenience, the message is question is reproduced below: Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from imo-r03.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.99]) by lists.primocomputers.com with SMTP (Lyris List Manager LINUX version 4.0); Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:06:16 -0500 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v33.5.) id d.182.cf079a8 (4222) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:05:58 -0400 (EDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:05:57 EDT Subject: Blaine says the Bible is a tool of Satan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10512 --part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_alt_boundary" --part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Glenn to DaveL - I have to stand by what I say in the subject line. BLAINE SAYS THE BIBLE IS SOMETHING THAT BRINGS PEOPLE UNDER THE POWER OF SATAN (1 Nephi 13:29-30). AND HE USES 1 NEPHI TO BACK IT UP!!! Again I say, Blaine let the cat out of the bag. Why would it take weeks and weeks for him to deny this?????? There are certain Mormon doctrines Mormons don't teach until people are deep in their cult of a different Jesus. Respond to the article I posted on TT. It sheds a lot of light on Mormon deception/wisdom. --part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_alt_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>Glenn to DaveL - I have to stand by what I say in the subject line. BLAINE SAYS THE BIBLE IS SOMETHING THAT BRINGS PEOPLE UNDER THE POWER OF SATAN (1 Nephi 13:29-30). <U>AND HE USES 1 NEPHI TO BACK IT UP!!!<BR> <BR> Again I say, Blaine let the cat out of the bag. Why would it take weeks and weeks for him to deny this?????? There are certain Mormon doctrines Mormons don't teach until people are deep in their cult of a different Jesus.<BR> Respond to the article I posted on TT. It sheds a lot of light on Mormon deception/wisdom.</U><BR> <BR> </FONT></HTML> --part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_alt_boundary-- --part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rly-xg01.mx.aol.com (rly-xg01.mail.aol.com [172.20.115.198]) by air-xg02.mail.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILINXG24-0819090146; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:01:46 -0400 Received: from mail.innglory.org ([205.217.113.140]) by rly-xg01.mx.aol.com (v87.22) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXG15-0819090050; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:00:50 -0400 Received: from mail.webcosolutions.com [216.54.217.8] by mail.bestware.biz with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.12) id AD5F1FAB0068; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:06:39 -0500 Received: from DAVIDP4 [64.132.240.86] by mail.webcosolutions.com (SMTPD32-7.00) id AD336C3400EA; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:05:55 -0400 Message-ID: <004101c24780$47ab4d70$0301a8c0@DAVIDP4> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "TruthTalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <LYRIS-5-17967-2002.08.18-19.10.11--David#[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [TruthTalk] Book of Mormon full of errors Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 08:59:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glenn wrote: > Yes I attack a cult that I believe is leading millions > to hell fire. I plead guilty. DAVEH: > Do you feel the same way about Christian denominations > that do similar? Or do you just have a "double standard" > with regard to the LDS Church? Let me comment a little on this from my perspective. I think Glenn would be equally concerned about individuals within other Christian denominations that would do the same. For example, you might find Glenn just as unsympathetic toward Protestants who believe that the Bible is largely myth, that Moses did not write the Torah, that the creation account comes from Babylon mythology, etc. The main difference is that if it is only individuals within a denomination that say these things, and the denomination itself is not declaring these things, then the denomination is not to be castigated but the individuals. The thing about Mormonism is that it is the denomination itself which has taken dangerous doctrinal positions which leads people into missing out on salvation and true faith in Jesus Christ. Therefore, he would condemn the denomination as a whole. My personal perspective is that I don't care so much for any Christian organization. I don't care about lifting up one denomination over another, nor about tearing one down over another. I believe that God and the Holy Spirit work independently of these man-made organizations. God will save a Buddhist and a Muslim and a Mormon and a Christian all the same. He does not care about your religious affiliations. Because of this persepctive that I have, you don't find me too often castigating Mormonism as a religion. I will point out the errors of Joe Smith. I will warn others that he was a false prophet. I will let others know that I consider the Book of Mormon to be the work of Joe Smith and not the work of God. I will give reasons for that. But the religious organization, in my opinion, is on just as sandy a foundation as many of the other more "orthodox" organizations. They are worse than many other Christian organizations, because they believe that they are the true church. They confuse the Church of Jospeh Smith with the churches of Jesus Christ. In this vein, the are in the same position as the Roman Catholics, Church of Christ, etc. If you ask Glenn about Jehovah's Witness, he will probably consider them just as bad as Mormonism. That's because they too attack the Bible and try to retranslate it to fix it. Glenn wrote: > Again, I have not seen one thing you have shown > in the Bible that is in error. DAVEH wrote: > Perhaps you didn't read my previous post today...... > http://users.pipeline.com.au/bangsund/muphry.htm > ************ Here again is a difference in perspective. In Glenn's view, and mine, this link is evidence that God has PRESERVED his Holy Word. It is not evidence that it has been corrupted. These mistakes in printing, etc. show that despite all the efforts to change the Bible, God fixes these problems and we still have his Word and have dismissed those counterfeit Bibles. We would not know that these were problems in the past except that the Word has been preserved by God. Now you might argue, how can we know for sure that there are not other mistakes that we cannot discern because we don't have anything to compare it too. Well, that is where faith comes in. Faith does not need empirical proof to affirm a truth. Faith looks to God, through the Spirit, to discern a matter. By revelation, we know that Jesus died for our sins. And it is by revelation that we know that the Bible is God's written Word preserved for all mankind. The problem is that the Mormons appear to lack this revelation from God. Joseph Smith claimed to have a revelation that the Bible is missing many plain and precious parts, and that because of these missing parts, many have been brought under the power of Satan. Mormons are taught to believe this. This is very dangerous, because it is contrary to the revelation that many of us have, that the Bible is God's Holy Word, a tool used by God to unlock many mysteries that pertain to the Kingdom of God. When people believe Joseph Smith over the revelation of the Holy Spirit concerning the Bible, we have a major problem, and that is why many call some Mormon organizations like the LDS one a cult. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. --part1_182.cf079a8.2a924735_boundary----- End Message ---
