Blainer wrote:
> Of course there are differences, now, many years later,
> due to changes  that have occurred in the situation.  And
> there are doctrinal differences due to non-acceptance of
> revelations which came after the BoM was translated.
> I could list a few differences myself, probably more
> than you or DavidM.  But the question was, did the BoM
> cause the split WHEN it occurred?

You are changing the subject.  You made the following assertion, and I quote
you exactly:

Blaine wrote:
>> I don't know of any doctrinal differences among
>> believers in the BoM.  How do you explain that?

The question was not whether the BOM caused divisions, but whether or not
the BOM resolved divisions.  You claimed that you did not know of any
doctrinal differences among believers in the BOM.  The implication was that
the BOM unifies people and resolves differences.  Now, after we challenge
your assertion, you claim that you know of more doctrinal differences among
those who believe in the BOM than we do!  It is impossible to carry on an
intelligent conversation with you.  Instead of admitting that you made a
mistake or said something incorrectly, you go off down another rabbit trail
and blame everyone else for not being able to follow your conversation!  You
blame Glenn for creating smoke screens, when you have created a huge cloud
of smoke with your contradictory statements.

Blainer wrote:
> If you can show me--I repeat SHOW ME--where divisions
> occurred due to failure to understand what the BoM is saying,
> then do so.  I will listen if it is provable.  It isn't all that important
> to me one way or other anyway.  THIS IS JUST A DISCUSSION,
> not a war.

Talk about double standards!  How about you first show us where the Bible
caused divisions, not AFTER it was translated, but BEFORE it was translated.
LOL.  If you can do that, then I will show you where the BOM caused
divisions before Joseph Smith was even dead.  Is that fair enough?  And
believe me, there were many divisions caused before Joseph Smith died,
especially among those who knew him best.

With regard to your comment about how the divisions were caused by
additional revelation after the translation of the BOM, aren't you aware
that this is the same reason that many Protestants are against the idea of
continued revelation?  In other words, they reject the Mormon doctrine of
continued revelation for this reason you state, that it divides people.
Both Mormons and Protestants claim they know the reason for increased
divisions among believers, but they are both wrong because the Bible tells
us that divisions are caused by carnality, not by additional revelation.
What a logical mess we have here!

Peace be with you.
David Miller.

----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who 
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be 
subscribed.

Reply via email to