[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glenn - I've told you this before. If it CAN be taken literal it MUST be taken literal.DAVEH: I do not recall you saying such before, but I do have a bad memory. Is your above reasoning a commonly accepted method of understanding the Bible amongst other Protestants? And....is it accepted amongst Bible scholars? Or....is this just your personal way of understanding the Bible, Glenn?
Jesus returning on a two-headed flying horse is symbolic, I have know fire is real.--
DAVEH: So how do you distinguish between symbolism and reality in the Bible? Why think this account is real when Bible scholars disagree?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
