There is no need to talk when you agree with something and then proceed to make it mean something entirely differernt.  This is talking about the Bible ONLY.   What you are saying is entirely rewritting the article.  My friend, I can't trust anything you say about what you believe.  The twisting never stops.  I am not upset with you, I just see you for what you are. 

Glenn - This is not what you said the first time.  Here is explain away the inerrancy of the Bible.  THE ARTICLE DID NOT SAY THAT.  THE ARTICLE SAYS THE BIBLE IS INNERANT IN AND BY ITSELF. DAVEH:  Only if one defines 'Bible' as the original revealed Word of God, rather than the individual translations we have today that most folks think of as the 'Bible'.  As the article pointed out, errors have crept into the modern translations. Did you happen to miss the parts of the article that  I am surprised you think I'm being deceitful by gleaning such fro m the article.     Did you happen to miss........ "So inerrantists should welcome the work of textual scholars, who are forever trying to eliminate the inauthentic and give us exactly what the biblical writers
   wrote, neither more nor less."



Reply via email to