In the words of Benjamin Franklin "Those who give up essential liberty to 
obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 

Liberty at Risk


In the 1970s, the U.S. Senate's "Church Committee" revealed that the CIA and 
the NSA had been conducting illegal surveillance on American citizens for 
years. In response, Congress enacted a series of reforms, notably the Foreign 
Intelligence Surveillance Act.  

Under Executive Order 12333, signed by President Ronald Reagan, the CIA is 
permitted to secretly collect "significant" foreign intelligence within the 
United States ONLY if the collection effort is NOT aimed at the domestic 
activities of U.S. citizens and corporations.

Now the head of the National Security Agency has told Congress openly that 
they should aim "Echelon", the super secret and most powerful surveillance 
system in the world, directly at American citizens.  

The vast international global eavesdropping network Echelon is said to be 
able to monitor ALL, as in EVERY one, of the world's telephone and fax 
transmissions and sift out messages it finds interesting.  According to 
published reports it is alleged that computers are now automatically 
analyzing every phone, fax, and data signal, and can also identify calls to 
say, a target telephone number in Dallas, no matter from where the call 
originates.   Originally designed to snoop on the Russians the system has 
been expanded to eavesdrop on domestic citizens of all nationalities and it 
is now believed that much of the work appears to be focused on commercial and 
private civilian targets.  



Concerned over the loss of privacy and the rights of U.S. citizens, the 
retiring House majority leader, Dick Armey recently said, "I told the 
president I thought his Justice Department was out of control. Are we going 
to save ourselves from international terrorism in order to deny the 
fundamental liberties we protect? It doesn't make sense to me," he told USA 
Today. 

Armey is also on record, in a speech to the Federalist Society, as saying 
that the federal government has a dismal record when it comes to safeguarding 
private information: "We have no credibility on the issue if we cannot clean 
up our own act." 

His comments come only two months after he and the ACLU criticized government 
use of technology that digitizes video images of faces and checks them 
against photos of people wanted by police, and they coincide with the ACLU's 
new $3.5 million advertising and lobbying campaign accusing Attorney General 
John Ashcroft of eroding personal freedoms in the application of the USA 
Patriot Act.

Further complicating the privacy issue, the Central Intelligence Agency 
announced this week that it is expanding its domestic presence, placing 
agents with nearly all of the FBI's 56 terrorism task forces in U.S. cities. 
The CIA officers work in special parts of the larger task force buildings, 
behind walls impenetrable to electronic eavesdropping.  

In Oregon, Portland Police Chief Mark Kroeger said there remains a deep 
distrust toward giving law enforcement or the CIA expanded powers. Although 
he approves of the CIA presence, he said he purposefully stays clear of the 
CIA officers. "I know very little about them and I choose to keep it that 
way," he said. 



Complications from the hurriedly passed USA Patriot Act abound, another 
wrinkle is that banks, broker/dealers and insurance firms will be forced to 
spend a total of $10.9 billion on anti-money laundering initiatives 
orchestrated under the umbrella of catching terrorists, according to a new 
report published by Celent Communications. However, terrorist activities 
account for less than 1/4 of 1% of what the Treasury Department considers 
laundered money, according to the report.  The real focus for these 
procedures is revenue collections and citizen control...certainly not 
terrorism.

The USA. Patriot Act was passed directly after 9/11 in the US Senate with 
only on dissenting vote.  The dissenting vote was cast by Sen. Paul Wellstone 
from Minnesota who was also the only person in the Senate to have read the 
bill before it was voted on.  He pleaded with his peers to read the bill 
prior to the vote to no avail.  He was killed October 25, 2002 in a private 
plane crash just two weeks prior to the elections.  

The erosion of personal privacy coupled with the alarming increase in citizen 
control laws has been achieved under the cover of fighting the "war on 
terrorism" and the "war on drugs."  The assault on personal rights, including 
privacy, is justified with convincing arguments about the common good and how 
the State is "improving" the quality of the protection it provides its 
citizens.  On closer examination one may observe that the "common good" 
always happens to benefit the political concepts of those in power and that 
the individual's loss of personal power is quickly transferred to the 
bureaucracy.




----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who 
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be 
subscribed.

Reply via email to