|
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 11:43:38 -0500 "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
<<The conclusion is based upon the premise that all dogs have four legs and it is perfectly logical. >> not really; two false premises
emerge at the base, not one
the premise that 1[all dogs have four legs] is
false
that 2[fido is not a dog] because he has only
three legs is ridiculous
so, the allegedly solid 'logic' is as
superficial as this:
1Christians are perfect
2Dr GT is a
Christian
Therefore, Dr GT does not sin in sum, while syllogistic
logic appears to make sense, in reality it might be ridiculous (e.g.,
unless Glenn is truly sinless) (e.g., unless 3-legged fido ain't a really a dog:-)
|
- RE: [TruthTalk] Logic ttxpress
- RE: [TruthTalk] Logic ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Logic ttxpress

