ftr, MD, some ignoramus (not me:-) referred to this thread as 'spam'--no
idea why; spam is unsolicited
email, not email the ideas of which one (solicits here on _tt_, but)
dislikes; also, note my
corrections, below--sorry--i'm a lousy typist, MD, and semi-illiterate acc to
some of my critics, partic when typing in a hurry, however, i recognize that's
no excuse for a substd post...(and while i'm at it) even a susbstd post (with egregious errors) is not
necessarily 'spam'; and, comments on this issue are welcome from anyone here,
perhaps belong in a new thread, though
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:48:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:50:35 +0000 (GMT) =?iso-8859-1?q?michael=20douglas?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Michael D:
||
Transformation from the old to the new, is the next big thing on God's agenda.
'transformation' to new truth from old truth would be welcome biblical change--it's not liberalism, but radicalismin typical traditionalism, the same old stuff, e.g., hermaneutical gematria brought 'forward' as truth, amounts to reverse 'transformation'--it is invalid tradition asserted in genuine ignorance, kinda like an eagle tryin' to soar while chained to thr flooradvancing traditional lies as 'truth'--institutionalized--as in (e.g.) Mormonism and Catholicism--is not quite the same, though, because those involved seek to adapt (or evolve or transform) their lies--have no interest in truth per se or in any (biblical) knowledge counter to their institutional claims
