I am possibly the ignoramus you are referring to.  Through no choice of my own, our service provider has taken it upon his/her/their selves to place "possible spam" on the subject line of many of the messages we receive.  This is supposed to be beneficial to those who cannot tell a casino advertisment or a penis enlargement pill from a note from uncle Jed.  Just why we are assumed to be so ignorant that we need this help is something I do not understand, but we are stuck with this unwanted benefit and the only way to get rid of it is to change providers.  Being rural rednecks, other providers are limited in this part of the woods, so all I can do is offer an explanation and ask you to ignore the offending addition, as when we reply, the "possible spam" goes along with the message.                                                                                                    
Blessings,
Terry
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:46 AM
Subject: **Possible_Spam** Re: **Possible_Spam** Re: [TruthTalk] differences

ftr, MD, some ignoramus (not me:-) referred to this thread as 'spam'--no idea why; spam is unsolicited email, not email the ideas of which one (solicits here on _tt_, but) dislikes; also, note my corrections, below--sorry--i'm a lousy typist, MD, and semi-illiterate acc to some of my critics, partic when typing in a hurry, however, i recognize that's no excuse for a substd post...(and while i'm at it) even a susbstd post (with egregious errors) is not necessarily 'spam'; and, comments on this issue are welcome from anyone here, perhaps belong in a new thread, though
 
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:48:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:50:35 +0000 (GMT) =?iso-8859-1?q?michael=20douglas?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Michael D:

||

Transformation from the old to the new, is the next big thing on God's agenda.

 
'transformation' to new truth from old truth would be welcome biblical change--it's  not liberalism, but radicalism
 
in typical traditionalism, the same old stuff, e.g., hermaneutical gematria brought 'forward' as truth, amounts to reverse 'transformation'--it is invalid tradition asserted in genuine ignorance, kinda like an eagle tryin' to soar while chained to thr floor
 
advancing traditional lies as 'truth'--institutionalized--as in (e.g.) Mormonism and Catholicism--is not quite the same, though, because those involved seek to adapt (or evolve or transform) their lies--have no interest in truth per se or in any (biblical) knowledge counter to their institutional claims

Reply via email to