Re: [TruthTalk] 2Iz: MMC/PP?/

[Dave]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 Cor 7 is posed as a question, Iz--perhaps as food for thought in your case so you can ask yer husband about it <rof>...whewy..(perhaps i should spare you the rof till i'm sure you undertstand it..shall i remind myself to K.I.S.S.?? <x666!>)--FTR, Did you know that DaveH; et.al. relatives, etc. who don't stick there weazily heads out of their holy TT hole no more due to getting whacked, DAVEH:   Hey g.....I've been whacked in TT so many times, I'm punch-drunk and don't know when to quit poking my " weazily head" out.  I intend to respond to CP's "whacking" post, but I simply don't have the time right now. sorta like CP recently whacked DaveH again (and rightly so!); use/s v29, below, to argue that the Ap Paul assumes the validity of polygamy even! while the Ap Paul is clearly! desiring to 'spare' people from the troubles of marriage btw, the word 'marry', below and in KJ English (too, relative to NT Greek sources behind both the NIV and KJV) contains the biblical premise/s: 'only once and exclusively (till death)', not the hellish 'multiple and inclusively (whenever)'; and, partic with respect to 'a woman', not 'numerous women' ..so, Iz..(K'ing. I. S. S.) (for me, too:) How does MMC relate to MMM? Don't you often wonder..what's your view? e.g., How much female related Private Property does God allow a man?? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.