1 Cor 7 is posed as a question, Iz--perhaps as food for thought in your case so you can ask yer husband about it <rof>...whewy..(perhaps i should spare you the rof till i'm sure you undertstand it..shall i remind myself to K.I.S.S.?? <x666!>)
--
FTR, Did you know that DaveH; et.al. relatives, etc. who don't stick there weazily heads out of their holy TT hole no more due to getting whacked, sorta like CP recently whacked DaveH again (and rightly so!); use/s v29, below, to argue that the Ap Paul assumes the validity of polygamy even! while the Ap Paul is clearly! desiring to 'spare' people from the troubles of marriage
 
btw, the word 'marry', below and in KJ English (too, relative to NT Greek sources behind both the NIV and KJV) contains the biblical premise/s: 'only once and exclusively (till death)', not the hellish 'multiple and inclusively (whenever)'; and, partic with respect to 'a woman', not 'numerous women'
 
..so, Iz..(K'ing. I. S. S.) (for me, too:) How does MMC relate to MMM? Don't you often wonder..what's your view? e.g., How much female related Private Property does God allow a man??
 
On Thu, 29 May 2003 20:10:06 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

And your point is? Izzy

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 2Iz: MMC/PP?

 

1 Cor 7

..those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.
29  What I mean, brothers, is that the time is short. From now on those who have wives should live as if they had none;
30  those who mourn, as if they did not; those who are happy, as if they were not; those who buy something, as if it were not theirs to keep;
31  those who use the things of the world, as if not en
grossed in them. For this world in its present form is passing away...



 


 

 

gary ottoson * http://ozg2003.blogspot.com

Reply via email to