jt: I stand corrected DavidM, yes you did send two of the same verses
among the six. I must have been tired when responding this afternoon..  

dm:You asked me if I could share more than one verse for a theology of
the
work of regeneration through baptism.  So, I shared the following
passages:

Acts 2:38-41 KJV
Acts 8:12 KJV
Acts 22:16 KJV
Romans 6:3-6 KJV
Galatians 3:26-27 KJV
1 Peter 3:21 KJV

Later you wrote:
So... 1 Peter 3:21 must be understood in the light of the following: 
 Colossians 2:11, Romans 6:3-8, Galatians 3:27

jt: On second thought I would remove Galatians 3:27 above
because I believe this is not referring to water baptism but rather
a spiritual baptism into Christ.  There is more than one kind of
baptism. 

dm: Notice that two of these passages (Romans 6 and Galatians 3) are the
same ones that I shared with you to show the link between baptism and
regeneration.  Romans 6 associates baptism with being baptized into
Christ's death.  It uses the term "buried with him by baptism."  It
speaks of our old man being crucified with him, the same analogy that
Peter uses in speaking of how Noah was saved by / through / via water.
It then speaks of the resurrection and being raised with him.  

jt: Yes I believe we do agree on the above in all but calling it
symbolic.
I don't think there is anything wrong with saying it is symbolic and/or
figurative but you don't seem to approve of that.

dm: Galatians 3:27 says, "For as many of you as have been baptized 
into Christ have put on Christ." So it associates baptism with putting 
on Christ.

jt: I do not believe this refers to water baptism because in other
places putting on Christ involves putting off and putting on some 
things which are not possible by water ie:

"But put ye on the Lord jesus Christ and make not provision for
the flesh to fulfil the lusts thereof" (Romans 13:14)
 
"But now ye also put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy,
filthy communication out of your mouth. Lie not to one another
seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds. Put on 
therefore as the elect of God, holy and beloved bowels of mercies, 
kindness, humbleness, of mind, meekness, longsuffering"
(Colossians 3:8,9,12)

David Miller wrote:
None of these passages teach that baptism is only 
 an outward symbol of an inward experience that had 
 already taken place sometime before.

Judy wrote:
The implication is there - It symbolizes the death, 
 burial, and resurrection of Christ. We certainly don't 
 die physically down there as he did on the cross and 
 we don't go from the water to a tomb physically do we?  
 So it is a symbolic representation of this reality.
I have to wonder if how many who go under the water 
 these days realize what it is all about.

We agree that baptism has much symbolism.  That is 
not the problem.  The problem is when you relegate baptism 
to merely being symbolic, then baptism loses all its power.  
The implication of these verses is that there is something 
powerful going on with baptism, that it is much more
than some outward symbolism of some past inward event.

jt: If there is something powerful going on it is between the
Lord and the person involved but I don't believe we can
count on it or promise ppl that if they go under the water
that God will do something powerful for them, this is what
encourages religious ritual like the Hindus all bathing in the
ganges because that river is so powerful.

dm: If baptism is merely a symbolic outward expression 
and not meant to do anything inwardly, then nobody will 
enter baptism with faith and none of these teachings of 
Scripture concerning the inward work of baptism will
be true in their lives.  

jt: The the work must be done inwardly BEFORE baptism 
and this should be the source of faith. I've always given &
seen testimonies of faith BEFORE baptism. It is primarily
an act of obedience.

dm: It becomes a self fulfilling teaching of sorts in the same 
way that when people are taught that Jesus does not heal
anymore, then they do not experience healing.  

jt: What do you think we should teach them to expect then?
Should we go back to the days of Luther? According to him
baptism even conferred all of the gifts of the Holy Spirit - 
yet I've not read or heard of anyone back then coming out 
of the water speaking in tongues, have you?

Grace and Peace,
Judy
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to 
send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to