Blaine,  Hi Judy,  Well, the point was that they could not reason against him--they might have tried rationalizing, or in other words, making excuses for themselves.  But apparently they were so used to being in charge, they expected compliance with their dictates and their traditions to be automatic.  Of course, they were envious!!   And remember, charity envieth not!  They had no love in their hearts for him, so they sought to kill him, and finally succeeded.  They had tried before, but failed, and would have failed again if it had not been for the betrayal of Judas Iscariot--the unrepentant thief, the man who carried the money bag, who let his greed overpower his testimony that Jesus was the Messiah, something he knew to be true.  Do you suppose these men who paid Judas 30 peices of silver (the price of a slave)  were aware, along with Judas, that this was the Messiah they were doing away with?    There is evidence they were.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:09 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] arophobia: fear of reason

Hi Blaine:
There is no reason against the Truth and the people knew Jesus spoke
as one having authority and not like the scribes (Mark 1:22 and
Matthew 7:29).  It was not for "arophobia" that the Jewish leaders had
him killed, it was for envy (that green eyed monster); this is what the 
scripture teaches. Pilate the Roman Governor was the one with civil 
authority and he was aware of this (see Matthew 27:18 and Mark 15:10)
 
Judy
 
From: "Blaine Borrowman"
Blaine: The Jews were free to use reason to counter his statements,
but chose instead to use their authority and influence to have him killed.
This was an extreme form of arophobia, I would say. 
 
From: Dean Moore
If this is true-Where does this place Jesus when he called
them hypocrites-foxes-blind leading the blind?
 
 
From: Blaine Borrowman
The word is �arophobia� \ n. (arophobe n., arophobic adj.).   Its
definition is as follows:  �The intense, abnormal, or illogical fear of
reason evidenced by personal attacks and/or attempts to place derogatory
labels on those with differing views.� 
To understand the etymology of this new word, you should know that the
Indo-European root of the word �reason� is �ar,� which means �to fit
together.�  Derivatives include words such as �army,� �harmony,� and
�arithmetic.�  In other words, one who is able to reason is one who is
able to fit things together and make some sense out of them.  When
coupled with the familiar suffix, �phobia,� which means �inordinate
fear,� you have this word, �arophobia.�  Thus my counsel:  Don�t be an
arophobe. 
I�ll share another quick story to exemplify an occasion when I believe
use of this word would have been appropriate.  A couple of months ago I
was invited to be a guest on a one-hour radio talk show originating in
Austin, Texas and accessible nationwide over the internet.  I joined the
broadcast via telephone. 
The one other guest on the show was in studio, I�ll call him Steve, a
homosexual man who with his partner was trying to adopt a child.  Steve
was an attorney there in Austin and was active in the community in
promoting a homosexual political agenda.  The recent Supreme Court ruling
in Lawrence v. Texas on sodomy was part of the discussion, as was a
possible federal marriage amendment and adoption by same-sex couples. 
During the discussion on adoption, Steve asserted in passing that
potential fears relating to pedophilia among homosexuals were unfounded
and that there were no differences between homosexual couples and
heterosexual couples.  Being aware of several studies that challenge this
assertion, I thought it needful to share them.  As I did so, Steve
immediately became emotionally charged and began shouting irrationally
into the microphone, �Liar!  Liar! Liar!  Liar!�  Although I could hear
his voice over the telephone, I could also hear my own and therefore just
kept talking.
Others listening to the show later told me that his voice completely
drowned mine out, and that my level voice could only be heard when he
took a breath.  When I stopped speaking, and he stopped shouting, the
host of the show attempted to make a reconciliatory statement and broke
for commercials.  Although a man practiced in rational argument, Steve�s
only response had been to abandon reason and attack the messenger.
Although I never met the man personally, I am left to conclude that Steve
is arophobic. 

Reply via email to