From: "Blaine Borrowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Blaine:  Noone ever said sacred underwear would be a protection
in the same sense as being righteous--But, I don't understand why
you are even concerned about the underwear I wear, Kevin?  
Are you just trying to be offensive, obnoxious, or what?
 
Judy:
He may be wanting to make you think... What do they tell you that
underwear is supposed to do for you?
 
Blaine:
When Ham uncovered the nakedness of his father, Noah,  Noah laid
a curse on him that was to be passed on to each succeeding generation.  
This seems like some kind of major over-reaction, does it not?   If Ham
had simply gone into Noah's tent and pulled the bed covers off him, and
thus exposed his naked body, I see no reason why such an incidental act
would elicit a curse upon Ham.   
 
Judy:
Ham was not honoring and respecting his Father. He not only stood and
took a good look himself rather than covering his Father, he went and got
his brothers to have a look also.  Noah wasn't being vengeful, he spoke
prophetically.  The problem wasn't a naked male body, the problem was
with love and respect.
 
Judy
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to