|
From: "Blaine Borrowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Blaine: Noone ever said sacred underwear
would be a protection
in the same sense as being righteous--But,
I don't understand why
you are even concerned about the underwear I wear,
Kevin?
Are you just trying to be offensive, obnoxious, or
what?
Judy:
He may be wanting to make you think... What do they
tell you that
underwear is supposed to do for you?
Blaine:
When Ham uncovered the nakedness of his father,
Noah, Noah laid
a curse on him that was to be passed on to each
succeeding generation.
This seems like some kind of major over-reaction,
does it not? If Ham
had simply gone into Noah's tent and pulled the bed
covers off him, and
thus exposed his naked body, I see no reason why
such an incidental act
would elicit a curse upon
Ham.
Judy:
Ham was not honoring and respecting his Father. He
not only stood and
took a good look himself rather than covering his
Father, he went and got
his brothers to have a look also. Noah wasn't
being vengeful, he spoke
prophetically. The problem wasn't a naked
male body, the problem was
with love and respect.
Judy
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Dave Hansen
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images elextech
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images elextech
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Blaine Borrowman
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Wm. Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images elextech
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] Graven images elextech

