(So far, in DaveHs case, ftr, the underware are
not magical:)
..which is to
say:
1) but DaveH didn't deny the
demonic influence upon Mormons steppin' one leg at a time
into certain undies for religious reasons; also, 2) that he
simultaneously acknowledges (non-literal) symbolism present in the
Mormon underware worn
I.e. Re/Read DaveHs post/s in this
thread to see exactly where/how he arbitrarily attributes symbolic
'power' to (wearing) certain underware; also, how he raises, unwittingly, I
suspect, the issue of 'demonic Mormon underware'
ftr, point 3 today could be that,
in general this thread indicates that Mormons like DaveH,
Blaine admittedly now, comprehend the 'power' of *selected*
religious symbolism...
..e.g., they comprehend in a
contradictory way or insist that Baptism is literal--denying it's
'imagery' or symbolic qualities..why?
..perhaps, Vince, anyone
interested: One may inquire, further, then, with respect to
'graven images or imagery', what Moses' writing
actually condemns (..not limited merely to
'condemnation' as prerequisite to 'destruction' of
'idols')
