[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:20:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:(So far, in DaveHs case, ftr, the underware are not magical:)
G ~ P 235..which is to say:1) but DaveH didn't deny the demonic influence upon Mormons steppin' one leg at a time into certain undies for religious reasons; also, 2) that he simultaneously acknowledges (non-literal) symbolism present in the Mormon underware wornI.e. Re/Read DaveHs post/s in this thread to see exactly where/how he arbitrarily attributes symbolic 'power' to (wearing) certain underware; also, how he raises, unwittingly, I suspect, the issue of 'demonic Mormon underware'ftr, point 3 today could be that, in general this thread indicates that Mormons like DaveH, Blaine admittedly now, comprehend the 'power' of *selected* religious symbolism.....e.g., they comprehend in a contradictory way or insist that Baptism is literal--denying it's 'imagery' or symbolic qualities..why?..perhaps, Vince, anyone interested: One may inquire, further, then, with respect to 'graven images or imagery', what Moses' writing actually condemns (..not limited merely to 'condemnation' as prerequisite to 'destruction' of 'idols')
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain Five email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
