From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Smithson wrote:
>> I am educated by the Word;
>> I am entertained by history.

Judy wrote:
> Truly wisdom from above
 
Terry wrote:
> What a great line!!!! Is that original?  Can I steal it?
 
Why is it that those who say such things always seem to be those
who are least educated in history? 
 
jt: How many 'great historians' has God chosen to use that you
know of? [in scripture that is]
 
dm: I would take such comments more seriously if such statements
came from historians.  I am not saying this as a jab, but to express
my incredulity after reading these recent posts.
 
jt: So if Will Durant made these claims he would get your attention?
 
The truth is that history is a body of knowledge from which all of us
interpret and understand truth, including truth found in the Bible.
History is the record of the experience of others.  The Bible's
foundation is history, so to say that history is for entertainment is to
say that the Bible is for entertainment. 
 
jt: The Bible is not history DavidM. It may contain history but it
is primarily God [who is Spirit] revealing Himself to man.
 
If someone is going to start arguing that Jesus did not exist, that David
did not exist, that Moses did not exist, that Abraham did not exist, that
the genealogical records of the Bible are fictitious, that Jerusalem did not
exist... come-on.
 
jt: And men have done all of the above - history and historians have
not convinced them to change their opinion.  The Holy Spirit does not
anoint history or men's opinions.

Such reasoning is ludicrous and is going down the wrong path.  To argue
that the acceptance of these historical facts is merely entertainment
and not education is walking down the path that would consider anything
material and experiential as having no basis in reality.
 
jt: The material and experiential is in the process of passing away
while God's Truth is eternal. His Words are spirit and they are life.
 
Everybody reads the Bible and interprets words from their experience.
If we read the word "prayer" in the Bible, we understand that from our
own experience of prayer.  If we are educated in history, then we might
have a more enhanced understanding of what prayer was actually like when
it is mentioned in the Bible.
 
jt: Depends on whose history, the pagans on Mt. Carmel prayed.
 
Now I certainly will agree that historians slant their presentation of
history, but that is not a reason to ignore history.  It is a reason to
broaden our study of history to include other historians.  It is a
reason to temper our historical knowledge with a trusted source of
knowledge... the Bible. 
 
jt: Noone is saying to ignore it, just keep it in perspective. I like
history in it's proper place.
 
Knowledge is NOT the enemy of the Word of God.  Knowledge is a
friend and companion of Truth.  Knowledge is not for entertainment. 
Knowledge gives us understanding of our own personal history and
gives us light.
 
jt: If the light within be darkness, how great is that darkness?

To reject knowledge is to choose darkness.  To appreciate knowledge,
especially historical knowledge, will lead us to wisdom and truth.
Jesus and truth are inseparable in my mind, and this leads to an
understanding that knowledge and Jesus is inseparable. 
 
jt: Spiritual ignorance is a form of knowledge and without spiritual
discernment darkness is called light. This is very evident on this
list.
 
To posit that history is entertainment is to posit that knowledge is
entertainment which equates with the idea that truth is entertainment
and that Jesus is entertainment. 
 
jt: Only if you are Mel Gibson. He combines the two. He did it with
Braveheart and now he has done it with the crucifixion. Swallow it
to your own peril.
 
Certainly Jesus and religion and history is entertainment for some people,
but not for me.  More importantly, I do not think there is any Biblical
justification for treating historical knowledge as entertainment.

judyt
 
God allows the devil to raise up heretics
to make his people study

Reply via email to