|
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Judy, When you read the scripture, I am sure you can tell an indicative from an imperative, right?
jt: I don't know whether I can or not Perry, I never
knew there were
such animals. But I do understand scripture without
having to know all
of the parts and where they fit just like I function in
my body without
consciously having to know and name all the parts and
tell them what
to do. God gave me this body and God the Holy
Spirit gives me
understanding of His Word as I am faithful to study and
seek Him.
Then, I would like to suggest that you are already identifying the
indicatives
and imperatives, you just may not have thought consciously about it. But
you
probably know that already. If you do indeed know that, then why the
negative
statement about it? You could have just as easily have made a positive
statement.
Or none at all.
jt: You are right that I could have ignored this stuff
- I certainly don't see much
positive about the TT Classroom experiment so I
was being honest.
I see Bill's post as merely suggesting that we begin
consciously noticing
the indicatives and imperatives. jt: What for?
No more, no less. For many readers this may bring out a dimension that
they had not previously consciously noticed.
jt: Will it make their walk with God any
closer?
If it does for you, the you have learned something. if not, then you could
have let it go. Your comment does not build up the body. It was not even a
doctrinal issue...in fact it was a neutral issue. jt: They say music is a neutral issue also - amoral (so
they say)
An observation and suggestion. It has nothing to do with leading us to
Bill's
particular doctrine.
jt: Let's wait on this one Perry. I won't be
surprised if Bill doesn't try to
prove some of his
scriptural concepts that have been refused by using these
indicatives and imperatives.
And, yes, even Israel had to understand the imperatives and declarations
that Moses spoke.
jt: When Moses gathered Israel every 7yrs; men, women,
and children; are
you telling me that they first had to understand this
stuff before they knew
what God was talking about? I don't think
so...
You comment on everything, and many your comments appear to be
negative.
jt: Yes I guess I do have a lot to say, noone can
accuse me of being a
passive listmember.
When you see doctrinal error, I can understand this as correction, but why be negative on neutral issues? Why introduce tension when it is not merited? jt: Let's wait and see if this turns out to be a
neutral issue in the end.
judyt
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Wm. Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Trut... Kevin Deegan
- [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Wm. Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Charles Perry Locke
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Kevin Deegan
- [TruthTalk] knowing Truth Judy Taylor

