----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 5:59
AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] FELLOWSHIP (was
Dialogue with Mormons)
He ate with them but ATST was separate from them,
fellowship
and relationship involve trust and
commitment..
"Jesus did not commit himself unto them,
because he knew all
men and needed not that any should testify of man;
for he knew
what was in man" (John 2:24) and
"For such an high priest became us, who is holy,
harmless,
undefiled, separate from sinners, and made
higher than
the heavens (Hebrews 7:26)
Jesus fellowshipped with those who had first made a
total
(left all) commitment to him.
jt.
and this is not the
standard Jesus and the First Century Church left to us.
Do you mean
that Jesus did not really dine with tax collectors and harlots?
John wrote:
I don't want to speak for Blaine, but I see nothing in
Mormonism that prevents either of us to fellowship with non-LDS
Christians. Perhaps I don't understand fellowship quite the
same way you do though. Fellowship. I do
think that fellowship is bigger than denominational boundaries but limited
by a true sense of mutuality and purpose. A lexical view of
koinonia reveals a number of nuances, to wit (old guys say
that a lot, "to wit"): fellowship, association, community,
communion, joint participation, intercourse. Note the progression.
It was part of the routine of the first church (Acts
2:42).
jt: Scripture defines "fellowship" as "walking in the
light as HE is in the light" This is the only way we can have true
fellowship (light also meaning truth) and this is when the
blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us. When we compromise with
the mixture we are fellowshipping with devils and this is not the
standard Jesus and the First Century Church left to
us.
john: My experience with the Mormon
church has been one that is the witness to a degree of exclusion
which goes beyond sectarian or denominational bias. It seems to me
that this exclusiveness is the surrounding halo of a world religion.
If that is the case, we have no fellowship or brotherhood.
I don't like saying that. I have only my instincts about
this issue. If Blaine and I are brothers (or Dave and I), to
what eventuality can we point as the defining factor which presents us
with the same Parent? Or is there more to brotherhood than divine
genetics?
jt: The fatherhood of God and brotherhood of man are taught
by Freemasonry and the mystic cults, it's part of the OLD religion. God
created all men but today Jesus defines the brethren. He said "who
is my mother and who are my brethren? and he stretched forth his hand
toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! For
whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is
my brother, and sister, and mother" (Matthew 12:48). This is an
impossible feat if we are holding on to 'doctrines of
devils'
judyt