But, i am privy to such. You two (david and john) prostituted your opinions to support each other on another List. Now you realize that David is "Holiness", and that John is a Divorced Sinning -Religion Calvinist, and your relation is not so comfortable. Is it any wonder?
That 5 ft. tall, 265 pound butterball named John Smithson is discovering how really lonely he is-----without God, without the Word to back his lifestyle, and without hope------sitting only on a pile of knowledge that he accumulated before quitting God's service as a full-time Senior Pastor, when he Divorced.
David has too much at stake re his soul to continue to prostitute his hermeneutics for a bowl of John's Hell-bound porridge.
I have been following you for two months now, John, and you impress all who meet you the same way-----a faux Christian shrink, who, needs badly to be shrunk by Jesus and His Word.
----Elsman the lawyer
In a message dated 4/1/2004 8:56:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You know what. I am going to take a break, myself. I will say something here that the rest of the list is not privy to -- bear with me.
When I defended you in regards to the vision you had about the wasteful purchases made at the computer store, I had no idea that your sense of guilt was because you considered yourself lost unless the matter was somehow reversed. Did you?
I will remind you that I took a lot of heat for that defense. I am hoing that is deserving of respect in this apparent disagreement. But that is not what I am feeling, right now.
I am hoping that much of this debate is about sematics -- but probably not.
I don't understand why you wait until now to disagree and with me. Why me? Why not Bill or Lance or ..... whatever. Maybe that is not important.
A brother, I hope, in full fellowship
John
