Denotative vs Connotative.What is primary is NOT the syntactical comparison of Scripture with Scripture but the semantic or the denotative reference..beyond to God Himself. This is how we TEST THE INTERPRETATION OR DOCTRINAL FORMULATION by tracing back our thought to its source in the reality known. Or, otherwise put: We refer everything to God and nothing to ourselves.We have to let ourselves be so radically called into question  as to be stripped of all our presuppositions and prejudgements. IT IS IN THIS ULTIMATE TRUTH OF GOD THAT AUTHORITY RESIDES AND NOT IN THOSE WHO INTERPRET IT NOR IN ANY SET OF RULES OR METHODS OR DOCTRINES THAT WE MAY BRING TO OUR INTERPRETATION OR FORMULATION. The truth itself anf not any formulation of the church's understanding is the criterion of true knowledge. More if anyone's interested Blessings, Lance
Sent: April 02, 2004 04:52
Subject: Fw: RE: [TruthTalk] Prophets

SO THE HOLY SPIRIT DID NOT INSPIRE ANY OF OF GOD'S PROPHETS 
FOLK - BELIEVE THAT AT YOUR OWN PERIL  .....
 
 
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

I never listen to Discouragers.  They are never Holy Spirit inspired. Izzy

 


 On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 4/1/2004 6:40:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I think the continuous case is appropriate here

Thanks Bill.  Mounce gives the "ing" English endings for the present tense application in the book I have on page 352 I believe.  It was taught to me in first year Greek.  No one has ever questioned it before.  I will continue using it in the way I did.  The quote David offers from Mounce is exactly what I am saying.  Maybe I did not communicate that as I should have.   I don't know.  But thanks for the impute.  

One other matter -- if any has any doubts or concerns about me because of Jim Elsman, feel totally free to off-list your concerns  ---  nothing to hide here.  Jim thrives on causing trouble.  I saved some of his "classics" from the past just in case he turned out to be someone who follows people around and does what he does.  You will note that I do not answer him  --  but he knows that if he says stuff often enough, some will listen.  He actually knows next to nothing about me.  He also loves to torment David Miller  --  more than me.   Just ignore it.  But I will gladly answer any concerns.  

John

Reply via email to