In a message dated 6/16/2004 10:42:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Now, Lance dear--are you about to exhibit presumptuousness? Why yes, I
believe that I am.

How is this conflict truly winnable? US must declare it's own Jihad on the
Muslim 'world'. Kick the people out who 'ought not to be in your country'.
Shut down the boarders.  Ratchet things up by a factor of  ten. Take and
hold the oil fields in Saudi Arabia.(much much more left unsaid) Evil must
be taken on with sufficient force to destroy it!

Now, did that 'relativist' Canadian actually say this? He did.


I have a lot of respect for you and your opinions, Lance.   On this particular discussion, I am not in agreement  -- but open to suggestion.  Let me ask you and even Jonathon this question (and an involved question it is):   Over the past 17 years we have lost over 4300 persons to the Jihad   ---   all pre Iraq, all without justification.    As it turns out, the 9-11 move was the first of a number of larger offensive attacks  --  none of which were/are the result of provocation (they were and have been planned prior to Iraq, as well)  -- what specifically would you do to counter these Jihad Muslims   --  our liberals (here in America do not have a clue   -  at least I haven't seen anything as of this writing.)  

Your choice?   To argue the "all without justification" phrase or give an answer.

a brother,
John, author of the
"The Gospel According to John smithson"

Reply via email to