Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Fundamentalist

[Lance Muir]

Izzy:Wrong? What do I find wrong with that? why nothing where it ought to be so taken? But, not in Daniel, Mt 24, & revelation. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 19, 2004 13:07 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:Fundamentalist Lance, I noticed that you also called David M a �Biblicist�.  My dictionary defines this as someone who takes the Bible literally.  What, pray tell, do you find wrong with that? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Fundamentalist   G:I don't think that it is the Vatican that produces 'fundamentalists'. Every group whether religious, political or social has a 'fundamentalist' component/wing. In such there tends to be a disdain for anything 'gray'. Black and white are preferred.[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 19, 2004 11:34 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Fundamentalist   it's interesting that the activism of both Protestant and Catholic conservatives closely match on, e.g., abortion politics--jt and Izzy themselves are as anti-abortion as the Pope   apparently the Pope is a biblicist, too, and the match entails the conclusion that the Vatican produces 'fundamentalists'... G   On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:56:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ||   ..feel free to add to the list