|
I may have unfairly jumped to a conclusion
concerning your concept, Slade, thus lumping you into a group in which you
do not fit. If this is so, please forgive me. When you
wrote, "see the miracles of Yeshua," I was thinking Yeshua would need to be
visibly present to be seen working the miracles; that is all. I did not
intend to imply that you interpret the passage this way in order to rid
yourself and others of the threat. I saw that only as a result of this
interpretation of the passage. I certainly do believe miracles still happen;
each time a person comes to faith, it is a testimony to the greatest of
miracles and demonstrates the ongoing miraculous work of God in Christ through
the Holy Spirit.
Why would Jesus need to be
seen?. God the Father was not seen when He was doing works through Jesus but at
least one man came to him and said "noone could do the works he did unless
God was with Him" and this was before the cross. People did not get Born Again
until the Spirit was sent at Pentecost. Being Born Again is a work of the
Spirit in a person's heart but it is not a working of Miracles.
Allow me to quote Charles Ryrie from his Study
Bible to give you an idea of why I may have prematurely evaluated what you were
saying: "Technically, according to the Scribes, blasphemy
involved direct and explicit abuse of the divine name. Jesus here teaches
that it also may be the reviling of God by attributing the Spirit's work to
Satan. The special circumstances involved in this blasphemy cannot be duplicated
today; therefore this sin cannot now be
committed."
Why look to the scribes for
wisdom? Weren't they the ones who hung out with the Chief Priest and
Pharisees all the time? Even the common people knew they didn't speak with
authority (Mark 1:22) and most of them didn't recognize Jesus as the Word of God
when he was speaking truth right to their face because of the
condition of their hearts.
I tend to agree with the
Scribes over the limited view of Ryrie: blasphemy is a deliberate
abuse of the divine name, a twisting of the identity of Christ, which
renders him less than Lord (Yahweh) and Savior, the effect being a denial of the
name of Jesus (Yahweh saves). And so the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, as I
understand it, is a refusal to yield to the present,
personal testimony of the Spirit to the person and work of Jesus Christ. In
the Hebrews passage that I mentioned, and you mentioned as well, the preacher
includes in his warning these words: "Of how much
worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has ... insulted
the Spirit of grace?" (10.29) What is this insult (which is certainly
blasphemous) if it is not the rejection of Jesus Christ, a blatant trampling
underfoot the Son of God through counting the blood of the covenant by
which he was sanctified a common thing (in other words, nothing at all) and not
the absolute and wondrous life giving miracle that it was?
The insult could be promoting
"another Jesus" an anti Christ, in the sense of (in place of) and this is
what we are warned against. Israel did it all the time. They followed their
own wayward hearts and their own ideas. Being obdurant, stiff necked, and
refusing to allow the Spirit through God's Word to lead us into ALL truth is
blaspheming the Holy Spirit because there is no other way to be saved. I
wonder if God will be pleased with 400+ different theologies and systems all
claiming to lead people to Him.
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Wm. Taylor
- [TruthTalk] 400+ different theologies and systems Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Wm. Taylor
- [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Wm. Taylor
- [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] God Hates Blaspheming Knpraise

