RE: [TruthTalk] Kruger

[ShieldsFamily]

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Kruger   In a message dated 9/8/2004 7:28:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Kruger   In a message dated 9/8/2004 6:54:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It means “That would probably be a waste of time.”  But thanks anyway, Izzy Extremely disappointing.  I think we should always thrill at the opportunity to expand our parameters.  John   John, How would talking to Mr. Kruger expand his or my parameters?  I think I would be misleading him if I indicated a desire to hear more about his views—I did read his book already, you know? And I doubt he is interested in my views, either, for that matter.  You’re a fan of his; why don’t you talk to him? Izzy