David Miller told you his intent, yet you infer that he is a liar. So who is ascribing evil? And who has an attitude whenever they are not agreed with? Izzy
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel Sorry Susan but, I can't go along with you as to the 'sainted' (to some) David Miller. You and the other DM devotees may continue to ascribe an intent that ain't present should you so wish. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: November 13, 2004 10:45 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel > It took me one e-mail to realize that David was one > who likes to challenge people to back up what they > believe. I believe that he is trying to have an honest > conversation with you. He just wants to see what page > you are on. Then if he disagrees he backs up his > beliefs with scripture. To say, "Absolutely no one > would conclude your defense from your questioning," is > an error. > > I think that you should willingly accept his > explanation because he is the person who made the > statements. He knew what he meant. > > I know what it feels like to misread someone's e-mail. > It has happened to me many times. But when I talked > with the person they explained what they meant. It > made it much easier to uinderstand where they were > coming from. But, I also took them at their word when > they explained things. > > Suzy > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 11/12/2004 11:09:24 AM Pacific > > Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > Is it possible that you have never > > > >>truly heard the gospel yourself? > > > > > > And his explanation of the above question. > > > > > > The questions were honest and > > > sincere questions concerning whether you > > considered your knowledge of the > > > gospel to be full and rich, or if there was the > > possibility that you might > > > have something to learn here. > > > > You question whether I had even heard the gospel > > -- which is very > > different from your "explanation." When you decide > > to involve yourself in honest > > exchange, I will be glad to continue or engage in > > discussion with you. > > Absolutely no one would conclude your defense from > > your questioning. > > > > John Smithson > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. > www.yahoo.com > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
