Stick around Suzy, you will get used to the abuse here! I get frustrated at times but I keep coming back for more. When I feel like it I dish it out as well!
Jeff
----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Gospel



I am admitedly confused between the Johns. One of them
said that and Lance said something too you are right.
Sorry for putting the wrong person with the quote. I
will consider looking at the archives. But I do not
want to get into the middle of anything. It seems like
this disagreement is one that will go nowhere.

All I was asking of the people in that discussion was
that they would not agrue like that. The whole "I know
you are but what am I" type argument is something that
we should be avoiding.

Suzy

--- Jonathan Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Suzy.  Wow.  And I am accused of being sensitive on
this board!  No need to
bow out.  I just suggested to you that there was
more to it than you at
first thought.  In other words, extend the grace you
have given to David to
John as well.

Furthermore the archives of this list are located at

http://www.mail-archive.com/truthtalk%40mail.innglory.org/index.html

You do not need to take my side in this at all. You do need to be aware that there is more than one side.

David (the owner of this list) often takes breaks -
up to three or four
months at a time.  His not posting is not a result
of any comments made on
the board.  David is a big boy and can easily take
care of himself.  And for
the record I did not accuse you of being a devotee
of the sainted David.
Please read more carefully before you state such
things.  That discussion
was with Lance and John, not me.

JBH

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Susan Petersen
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Gospel

Of course, I would not know the long history and I
have no archives to look back on since I just signed
up. What I saw as a newcomer is people arguing not
discussing. And why were they arguing because they
would not listen to the other when he claimed that
He
did not have an attitude. They are arguing because
the
other is trying to have them explain their point so
that they could understand.

I'm sorry if your feelings are hurt because I did
not
take your side so to speak. If I have spoken in
error
I apologize. I, in no way, was out to be a "judge."

I will bow out of this conversation since my
newcomer
input is not welcome. You may continue to agrue if
you
like. Let me just point out one thing before I leave
this conversation. David has not posted since you
accused him of being the sainted and that I was one
of
his devotees.

Suzy

Suzy
--- Jonathan Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Suzy,
>
> I am not sure what your purpose is here.  You have
> been on the forum for
> about 5 or 6 days and have jumped right into a
> discussion that has a very
> long history.  A certain edge has built up during
> this conversation they
> have been having.  Both of them have to
communicate
> through this edge.  You
> seem to be able to see John's edge but not
David's.
> When Lance points this
> out you jump on him and send some judgment his
way.
> I would suggest reading
> some of the archives so that you may understand
what
> is happening from both
> sides here.
>
> Questioning people's salvation has become a
> recurring theme on this forum
> for one of its cliques.   They believe that it is
a
> nice and effective
> tactic.  In reality, it is a hindrance to
dialogue.
> Knowing that this has
> been going on for months may help you understand
> John's reaction to David
> questioning John's grasp of the gospel.  It is
like
> an iceberg; a raw edged
> tip is above the water but much more lurks
beneath.
>
> Jonathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
> Of Susan Petersen
> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:01 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel
>
> That would be an invalid experiment because you
are
> excluding David's explanation of what he said. It
> was
> offensive to you after you read it. But after
David
> explained himself you rejected his explanation.
Take
> him at his word. Believe that he meant it as an
> honest
> question so that he could better understand where
> you
> were coming from. Iron sharpens iron. And I am
sure
> that hurts when it is done. I have felt it.
>
> Suzy
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 11/13/2004 7:45:51 AM Pacific
> > Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > Is it possible that you have never
> > > >>>>truly heard the gospel yourself?
> > >
> >
> > Suzy  -  let's try an experiment.   Take that
> > question, write it down exactly
> > as it is written, tell you unsuspecting friends
> that
> > someone on an email
> > group presented this question to you and ask
them
> > what they think it means?
> >
> > Wanna bet no one will come up with anything
> similar
> > to DM explanation?
> >
> > John
> >
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system
> (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.792 / Virus Database: 536 - Release
> Date: 11/9/2004
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned
with
> salt, that you may know how you ought to answer
> every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this
list,
> send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
you
> will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who
> wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be
> subscribed.
>




__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com


---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)

=== message truncated ===




__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to