Please explain the 'law of exclusivity' (#615) to me.
----- Original Message ----- From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: November 16, 2004 08:51 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Gospel > Lance, You seem to be developing the bad habit of interrupting the > conversation between others just to be negative. Izzy > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel > > 'how can we possibly interpret Scripture..' Some do some of the time and, > some don't some of the time. You demonstrate this reality in your > engagements with many over time on TT. As you well know, David, believers > misinterpret scripture often and, for long periods of time. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: November 15, 2004 17:26 > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Gospel > > > > Jonathan wrote: > > > Both of them have to communicate through this edge. > > > You seem to be able to see John's edge but not David's. > > > When Lance points this out ... > > > > I thought Lance sincerely questioned the possibility of there being an > edge. > > Did I miss something? > > > > Lance, do I try and communicate through "an edge," whatever that means? > > > > I think Suzy said it best when she said that I try and challenge people on > > what they believe. I'm like the old lady asking, "where's the beef"? I'm > > still a student, a work in progress. > > > > Jonathan wrote: > > > Questioning people's salvation has become a recurring theme > > > on this forum for one of its cliques. They believe that it is a > > > nice and effective tactic. In reality, it is a hindrance to dialogue. > > > > I hope you do not perceive any of my posts as questioning someone's > > salvation. I get really tired of this art that some here have of reading > > between the lines and accepting their interpretation as truth even when > the > > author tells us that the reading was wrong. If any of us do this in > direct > > correspondence with each other, how can we possibly interpret Scripture > when > > there is not audible voice to tell us that we misunderstood what we read? > > > > Peace be with you. > > David Miller. > > > > > > ---------- > > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may > know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org > > > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know > how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) > http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a > friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. > > > > ---------- > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org > > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
