I, for one, do not.

I'd still appreciate a response to my other query for the reasons given.

I saw a 'piece' on last nights news concerning rather violent opposition on
the part the other kind of liberals toward republicans at a California
University.(no shirts ripped off that I noticed)

One occasionally gets the idea that you either seek out or actually
intentionally precipitate 'shirt ripping' responses.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 20, 2004 10:45
Subject: [TruthTalk] Defining Liberal


> David Miller wrote:
> >> 'In my opinion, almost every professor of theology is liberal.'
>
> Lance wrote:
> > I'm energized by this charge of yours, David.
>
> Finally!  A passionate response from Lance.  :-)  I like it.
>
> Lance wrote:
> > Will you kindly do the following?:
> > 1. Define liberal
> > 2. Supply us with a few dozen names which
> > support/exemplify your charge
>
> I would be glad to define liberal, but I don't see the point in supplying
> names.  Let's discuss the meaning of liberal first and see if we can meet
> some common area of agreement.
>
> First, let me say that I do not think of "liberal" as a dirty word.
> Although I am a registered Republican and very conservative in my economic
> and political views, my social viewpoints are very liberal.  I believe
that
> the strong ought to help the weak, and that we should take care of the
poor
> and destitute.  I have been a social activist at times, and such as caused
> many to think me to be a liberal.  I have never been offended at being
> called a liberal.  I have been invited to speak at socialist and communist
> meetings solely because of my successes in social activism.  Sometimes
those
> events did not turn out so well when they realized that I was a God loving
> Republican.  I remember being invited to speak on a radio show once, and
the
> talk show host about fell over when I told her I was a Republican.  She
was
> a communist and had no idea that some Republicans were so involved in
grass
> roots efforts to help the poor.  At a socialist meeting once, a man
enraged
> by my comments about God came out of his seat at the back of the lecture
> room and physically attacked me, tearing my shirt into shreds right off my
> back before others pulled him off of me.
>
> Anyway, with the preceeding caveat out of the way, let's define liberal.
> Following is not an absolute, but rather a working definition for the
> context in which I spoke:
>
> A liberal is someone who is broad-minded and tolerant of a wide variety of
> viewpoints.  They do not cling to a particular viewpoint concerning a
> religious text, but are very open to alternative explanations.  For
example,
> a liberal might entertain ideas such as the fact that Moses and Abraham
did
> not actually exist, or if Moses did exist, then perhaps the Red Sea that
was
> split was really a shallow marsh, that the general theory of evolution
> better explains origins than the myth outlined in Genesis, that Moses did
> not write the Torah, but rather there were multiple authors, etc. These
> viewpoints would be extremes, but I think other theologians who accept the
> traditional viewpoints of the above issues also might be considered
liberal
> if they depart from the viewpoint of Jesus that few find the way to
eternal
> life.  In other words, liberals are those who entertain many ideas as
valid
> considerations whereas conservatives tend to follow a traditional or
simple
> reading of the text.  Liberals are always looking for other ways at
looking
> at an issue whereas conservatives tend to want to stick with tradition and
> what is safely known to be true.  Conservatives like absolutes whereas
> liberals shy away from absolutes and tend to think of truth as all being
> relative.
>
> I certainly could be wrong about my perception of most professors being
> liberal, because I have not surveyed all of them, but those coming out of
> seminary invariably show this bend toward liberalism, so I think it proper
> to view it this way.  On this list, I would say that you, Jonathan, John
> Smithson, Bill Taylor, and Gary all show this liberal tendency.  People
like
> Terry, Judy and Izzy appear to be more conservative.  At times I see a
> conservative perspective from Gary and Bill, as well as the others I
guess,
> and sometimes I see a liberal side from Judy and Izzy, so please take
these
> comments as generalizations and not absolute categories.  Do you or anyone
> else see it differently?
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to