Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:Are these the only two possibilities?
 
'God will lead you into truth' vs 'There is no such thing as truth' (Therefore, either God or the author of this _expression_ is a liar) 
 
'Multiple covenants' vs 'One unilateral covenant'(Therefore either God or the author of this teaching is a liar) 
 
David is partly correct when he says that there exists a responsibility on the part of the one writing to communicate with sufficient clarity so as to minimize confusion. 
 
On the other hand, as you are a man of maturity, let me suggest that you take more time for reflection on the above.Terry: thinking won't hurt you. Suggestion:Is it in anyway possible that BOTH are correct in some way?
 
Lance 
====================================================
I have reflected long and hard Lance.  I have had to apologise to my Lord for not defending His word sooner.  I remained quiet too long because I have no desire to hurt you or anyone else. I cannot compromise God's word, so my answer has to be no.  There is no way that you and God can both be correct.  That does not mean that I hate you or wish you ill.  It is just the way it is.  I hope that there is no room for confusion.  If God is right, you are wrong.  No wiggle room.
Terry


Reply via email to