Jonathan wrote:
>John is an excellent example of this. He has come to know
>Lance and Bill by being changed by them. This involves a
>great deal of intimacy that the scientific method lacks.
By the way, exactly how has John been changed by Bill and Lance?� What was
the problem before he met them, and what is the change in him now that he
has intimately come to know them?
David, I think Jon's assessment of Smithson's change should be accepted at face value in the light of several posts by Smithson dealing in detail with this subject. I am surprised that you would decide to argue this point.
Smithson
