|
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Miller wrote: >> Do you mean that the covenant is only binding on one party >> to the covenant and that it cannot be broken by anyone but >> the initiator of the covenant? Do you mean that the covenant >> exists and is in force no matter what the other parties to the >> covenant do? Lance wrote:
> Yes. jt: Then why was John the Baptist telling these
Covenant people to
repent because the axe was being layed to the root
of the tree and they
would be cut off? and why did Jesus call them
'vipers'?
Then do you consider every one of Abraham's physical descendants to be
still
in covenant with God through this Abrahamic covenant? jt: Jesus himself told them not to claim to be sons of
Abraham if they were
not willing to bear the right fruit because God could
raise up stones to
praise Him if need be. What do you do with
scriptures such as these? I
don't have time to look them up right now but you can
find them if you
are interested. judyt
|
- [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant Judy Taylor
- [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant Judy Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant Jeff Powers
- RE: [TruthTalk] Unilateral Covenant Slade Henson
- [TruthTalk] Epistle of Barnabas David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Epistle of Barnabas Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Epistle of Barn... Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] Epistle of Barnabas Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] Epistle of Barnabas Slade Henson

