Re: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God

[Lance Muir]

To the extent that one (anyone on TT) 'interprets' that one is an activist for that interpretation.As you read TT over time you will come to 'see' those 'that have ears to hear' and those that don't. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 28, 2004 14:04 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God Isn�t that the same as saying the Constitution is a �living, breathing� document so the activist judges can circumvent the original intent?  Oh, well, this line is going nowhere�over and out. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Schizophrenic God   In a message dated 11/28/2004 7:02:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Excuse me if I�m still a bit skeptical when you use the words �open dynamic theology�, John.  This is exactly the type of wording the liberal Supreme Court judges use when they want to change (read: trash) the original meaning of our �living, breathing� United States Constitution.  (Ever notice that?) Izzy I wasn't aware that the Supreme Court used "open dynamic theology" to negate precious court decisions>   Do you have an example? And  --   what does that have to do with my comments? John