I do not view the biblical message as law.
I know, but a great portion of the Biblical message is law. That is part of the problem in the discussions you have with Izzy. You only view part of the Biblical message while she is looking at the bigger picture.
John Smithson wrote:
She changed the subject for no logical reason. Not a good example of perceptiveness.
As I explained in the previous post, I thought she had very good logical reason. Maybe she is more perceptive than you are.
John Smithson wrote:
there is a TOE but it is not a mathmatical equation.
How do you know that? Without math, Einstein never would have developed his theories of relativity. I think any TOE would have to be mathematical in order to be predictive, which is the goal of every theory.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
