|
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:09:04 -0500 "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes: > >> ..propaganda spewed out about the American Indians.[..] makes it imperative to view them as enemies--which you said you do..see, the propaganda works well in materialzg your 'manifest destiny'; Rush's perspectiv, germane to this ongoing critq--quotd earlier in th week--defines your 'attitude/s' , a concept Lance pointd out today, wisely.. [also - thx Lance;
to summarize and move ahead here, as abov, 'manifest destiny' is certainly a
factor in (David's acceptance/production of ) Am. propaganda, not only
about Indians, but about prophecy...also, apparently, his
personal 'manifest destiny' lies in his 'prophetic office' devlopg the
propaganda of prophecy--covering his tracks through
history]
(and, slade: 'ff.'
is an acceptd abrev for 'following'--you may have figurd it out or been informd
by now--regardless, there's a list of such abbreviations somewhere, e.g., at
innglory.org..and, givn my horrid typg, abbreviatd style, feel free to
ask about this stuff:)
G
|
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] American Indians ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] American Indians ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians ttxpress
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians ttxpress

