More epistemological humility is what is called for by all.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 06, 2004 07:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Outside of the Cup

Please refresh my memory Lance.  What were those answers?  All I remember getting was the runaround.  These were honest questions.  If I am wrong, I want to know it.  If they are wrong, they need to know it.  There is no way to compromise.  You keep the law or you don't.  My Bible says you don't.
 Thank you in advance for any attempt you may make to answer those questions I asked.
Terry
====================================================

Lance Muir wrote:
I, for one, would not so assume. What we have here is a 'failure to communicate' (from one of MY favourite movies, 'Cool Hand Luke'). Answers have been given and, could be given again. They aren't the answers you want.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 05, 2004 17:10
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Outside of the Cup

Slade Henson wrote:
Yes you did ask or answers, Terry, but the tone is still unbecoming. I've been down that road with you and you've proven, historically, I might as well talk to the Palmetto bug. I love you, Terry, but don't waste your time until you want to be stretched instead of stroked.
 
-- slade
I don't know about stretched or stroked.  I just know that I made a legitimate request that both of you continue to dodge.  I do not see that as unbecoming.  We Christians are supposed to be ready at any time to give reasons why we believe as we do.  Either you have answers or you do not.  If you refuse to address my questions, I must assume that you do not.                                 Terry
.



Reply via email to