Please, this is a serious question. Is there the SLIGHTEST POSSIBILITY that
the baseball wielding recipient of your highly rationalistic presentation of
the gospel mistook your epistemological humility for pride? It would appear,
on occasion, that some on TT so perceive you?
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: December 07, 2004 11:16
Subject: [TruthTalk] Off Topic
> Jonathan wrote:
> > Define epistemological humility David.
> > See the very first post I put on TruthTalk
> > if you don't remember what it is.
> > Note Lance's inclusion of everyone ("called
> > for by all"). It was no attack on Terry any
> > more than it was an attack on Slade/Jeff/Kay.
> > This email tells us far more about a state
> > of your heart than of Lance's.
>
> I never said it was more of an attack on Terry than it was on
> Slade/Jeff/Kay. Addressing the humility of those in dialogue about Torah
> observance speaks to the heart of the persons involved rather than the
> subject. It does not matter how arrogant or sinful a person is in his
> posts, we should not be bringing any of that into this forum. We are here
> to discuss truth, not disciple one another in virtues. This forum is for
> the rational discussion of truth.
>
> Jonathan wrote:
> > John humbly illustrates an example from his
> > own life and all you have to come back with
> > is that you are so clearly above us all by not
> > having an ex-wife of your own. Sad. Tactless.
> > John certainly doesn't need me to defend him
> > in this but I am embarrassed by your asinine reply.
>
> More ad hominem statements. I said nothing about being above you all. I
> did not even say that John Smithson experienced divorce because of any
fault
> of his own. I was simply pointing out that I understand the concept of
> putting relationships before the need to be right. Marriage is something
we
> all have to work at, and it is something by which men must put this
> principle into effect. I believe strongly that if I did not learn this
and
> apply it in my life, I would have divorced my wife many years ago.
Neither
> you nor John Smithson know me. For all you know, I have had 20 ex-wives
> because of my observance of the rules. The Scriptures point to how a man
of
> God should have his home in order and be the husband of one wife. This is
> evidence of a man who works at the relationship first and foremost rather
> than rules. I was simply trying to help him understand the evidence that
> supports my statement so that he might not rely so much upon his
> misunderstanding of my posts and his own imagination of what a terrible
> person I am.
>
> I realize that it might be taken as a personal attack for me to say this,
> but I find some of you to be some of the most intolerant and judgmental
> people that I have ever met. I cannot hardly say a word without you all
> thinking evil of me and maligning me in any way that you can. I hope you
> think about this seriously. It does not effect my love and relationship
> with you, but it does make communication with you difficult.
>
> Peace be with you.
> David Miller.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
