Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth always rational?

[ttxpress]

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 07:06:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Correct me, then. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 11 December, 2004 22.59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is Truth always rational? myth (the summary sweep, below, conveniently omits referenc/s to key historicl, exegetical, literary, and theologicl data [e.g., one of your arguments is that HH, or members of HH, 'liked' JC--so what? what does it really mean?--does it mean that P/HH had nothin' to do w/ PaxR, below? the NT is v consistent about JCs terms of discipleship..th disciples prob 'liked' JC..how do NT authrs portray whom JC sought? but, when Pharisees approach  JC in the NT, is there evidenc that any were advancd to his inner circle? aside from mayb Nicodms/Jn3, it appears that Pharisee 'approachs' were always layg traps (against any insurgnc, e.g., Jn9, not only for JC)..lets examin NT evidnc to th contrary]   On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 21:48:58 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: || Pax Romana..ruled supreme, and Yeshua died.