Hold on to your hats as Lance actually answers Judy's questions!
 
1. Why would you think any of us are immune? As you have put the question (possible betrayal) none of us are immune.
 
2. A statement more than a question re: 'Brother' John's 'brotherhood status'. I read you as saying that 'you don't assume anything' May I believe that this is your 'take' also on David, Kay, Linda, Jonathan, Jeff, Lance et al? If not then, why not?
 
3. We all function from such a 'grid'.
 
4. THE BIBLE IS NOT SELF INTERPRETING! Therefore, you are practicing both (1) & (2). It's just that you, David and, Linda have a 'bees in your....' regarding the word 'theology'. All it means is talking about God.
 
Now, as to your answers to my questions 'stead of slip sliding away.    
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 17, 2004 07:32
Subject: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor

 
Jt:Why even bother writing what you just did? It utterly mystifies me.
 
jt: Because there is no such thing as "original righteousness" Lance and if Judas could walk with God in the flesh for 3 1/2yrs and betray Him at the end then why would you think that any of us are immune?
 
Lance: Is it not readily apparent to you, as it is to every participant on TT, that John is our brother in Christ. He is simply outlining an understanding that differs from your own. John is thoroughly conversant with the 'standard fare' of evangelical(ism). Judy, you are aware of that are you not?
 
jt: I don't assume anything Lance, I've been in too many Churches and around too many professing believers with off the wall beliefs and have seen too many men of God toppled from their pedestals for that.
 
Lance: I ask as I occasionally believe that you, David and, Linda are limited in your 'reading' to a 'theological grid'.
 
jt: And you don't think that you, Jonathan, Bill and now JD are limited in your 'relational' concept and cult of community?
 
Lance: You all say, from time to time: But Noooooooooooo, if you do not read and interpret aright (that is: as do I and many like me) then you do not understand GOD'S TRUTH (read what I've just interpreted and told you is correct)
 
jt: That may be how you hear/read it Lance (through your 'relational' etc grid). However, I see the conflict as one of two choices: (1) We can subject ourselves to The Word of God or (2) We can subject God's Word to our own theological model of how things should be.
You have heard of "original sin?"   What about "original salvation." ?????   Anyway  --  what I mean is that I have never considered myself lost.   That does not mean such was the case.    I was raised going to church.   I grew up in church.   My dad was an elder in church.  There has never been a time in my thoughtful existence when I did not think God in Christ died for me.  I was baptised at age 12, back in '57.   But I knew I was going to commit to that ordinance years before.   If "repentance" means a change of mind,   I have never had the need to repent.    Often the need to confess.      Am I the only one?   I don't think so.  I am going to go hide, now.  John
 
jt: Then you are still in your sin because "there is none righteous, no not one" Confessing is pointless unless we are willing to repent which is to let go of it or turn - JD Could it possibly be that you have never really understood "righteousness, temperance, and the judgment to come but have inherited a 'form of godliness?" because believing you were never lost is  delusion.
 
 
God saved me in spite of myself. It is a song about how I see the spiritual world.   I have never had the opinion that I was unsaved  --  but I can sing "I once was lost" with feeling.  JD

Opinions aside, brother John, could you clarify the above for me?  I know that you cannot be saying that you have always been saved, but that is what I got at first reading.
Terry




Reply via email to