|
-----Original Message----- POINT 1: Are you suggesting, David, that there was something out of
line in this post that's above and beyond a certain level that I need to be
aware of? Is Jonathan's reference to an erroneous theology being just plain
stupid any worse than the near-daily dose of anti-liberal rhetoric? If certain mindsets are OK to slam dunk and others are sacred cows, I need to know
this so I can properly monitor. POINT 2: While I understand you think the teaching needs to focus on different words, I think it's unfair to assume Jonathan is
intentionally throwing up a "big smoke screen to trick those who don't study
Greek." In fact, your wording below seems to be maligning Jonathan's character in
the same way Jonathan's maligned Izzy's, and Izzy with "The
Liberals." n
slade Slade, why is it that when
I respond to Lance’s statement, |
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas factor Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas fac... ShieldsFamily
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the Judas... Slade Henson
- Re: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the J... David Miller
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- ... Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the J... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- the J... Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- ... Slade Henson
- RE: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin -- ... ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Intentional sin --... Slade Henson

