Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth

[Lance Muir]

Yes, I can. IMO, I take God more seriously. You, dearest Linda, are a 'biblicist' while I am not. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 01, 2005 16:41 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth   Lance, do you see why some of us have a hard time believing that you take scripture seriously? You say here that a word (which you dislike/disagree with) in the Bible does not mean what it says.  Then you provide no reason or alternative meaning.  You just flat out reject it.  Can you resolve this apparent rebellion to God�s Word? Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 12:53 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth   You are correct, sir! That does not mean 'separation' as you mean it. ----- Original Message ----- From: Terry Clifton To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 01, 2005 12:42 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The place of creeds in relation to truth   Lance Muir wrote: Which 'truth', brother? Lance Muir wrote: The term 'separation from God' is both deadly nomenclature and, untrue. There wasn't, isn't and, won't be anywhere He's not. ============================================= That when Jesus says,"Depart from me,"  that somehow does not mean separation.  It's all in the book.  You probably knew that before you started reading false teachers. :-)