Re: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture

[Lance Muir]

NO! ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 02, 2005 07:26 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture Let me confirm that you ARE.  J  (Would you fix that please???)   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 6:06 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture   Let me confirm that JUDY AND YOU ARE NOT DIFFICULT TO INTERPRET. ----- Original Message ----- From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: January 01, 2005 21:56 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 8:11 PM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Believing scripture   In a message dated 1/1/2005 1:48:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jeff, I have no idea where YOUR venom came from below.  Judy gave us a scripture that explains exactly the remedy to Lance�s statement that At the core, I believe real change to be more apparent than real. To quote myself, "Who you are at six is who you are a sixty.  This is not �the divisive and argumentative spirit of this individual�  This is the power of God to change a person completely.  I can attest to it personally.  Can you? Izzy It has been my experience on this forum that, when the dust settles,  one side was speaking from a totally different point of view from the other.   Both were right, if you will, but only one side could admit that.   Is it possible that Lance is using this term "separation" in a different but legitmate way.   Now, I know, he could make that clear  --   but, among friends and fellow disciples, does he really have to.   I happen to like what Lance and Gary do with their posts   --   their style of writing is such that the only way you can gain knowledge from their presentations (at times)  IS TO ASSUME THE BEST of them and actually try to figure  out on your own what would have to be true for you  -- that would allow you to say exactly what they say. JD     JD, Why should we have to work at deciphering what they mean? Does this make anyone seem any more intelligent by being difficult communicators? Assuming the best about a person personally has nothing to do with it.  Judy simply stated the scripture that shows why, for a born again person, this should not be true. To take offense at that is NOT assuming the best.  Izzy