On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:38:04 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So be it !!!! How can I conclude that Dave Hansen is not a brother ( in the grandest sense of that word)
So be it !!!! How can I conclude that Dave Hansen is not a brother ( in the grandest sense of that word)
when this confession is so? The
only rebuttal, as I see it, is to effectively argue that "brotherhood" is based
upon doctrinal agreement that finds him no longer
a Mormon but allows me to continue as a Pentecostal and
and Kay as a Messianic and Bill as a Bricklayin
Fool For Christ and Jonathan/Lance as Canadian Mega Liberals
!!
jt: The Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of
mankind is a concept that comes from Freemasonry John. It is
not the doctrine "once
delivered to the saints" upon which the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ
stands.
Dave will never agree with us
"protestants," nor will any of us convert to Mormonism. Nor
will I ever be whatever Judy
is (I truly do not know her denominational
tie) or a Baptist as is BillyT.
jt: I'm a follower of Christ John. I
don't promote any denomination.
But the fact embraced in the above "confession"
binds us together in a way that cannot be destroyed. Why
so
------------ because we are
only passively involved in this reconciliation that
names Christ as the Author and Finisher.
Joseph Smith is not that --
neither is Charles Finney, the Pope, Calvin, Luther and the
like.
jt: Why do you say "passively
involved" John? I'm not passive. In fact I fear being lukewarm because Jesus
said
he would spew that kind out of his
mouth. I don't believe we need to be just like anyone else but we should
all be
saying the same thing.....about the
one we serve that is.
judyt
