Bill Taylor wrote:
 
Now let me give you and example of your caricatures from a recent post? However, this is subject to change if anyone can show me in the scriptures that I am in error and so far none of the "eternal son" people have done so. While I admit that on this occasion the infraction is slight, it does stand as an example of a caricature. I have written at length in the last few weeks explaining the orthodox doctrine of Christ and the relational nature of our the triune God. I have deliberately refrained from doing a lot of outsourcing. I have stuck to the exegesis Scripture to make this clear, even though there is some really wonderful, and informative, and authoritative stuff out there from which to draw, and I have done this because I know that you, if you are to see the light, will only see it via an exposition of Scripture. And Judy, don't deceive yourself: I have stated it in a coherent and cogent way. You have no excuse for not understanding. This doctrine has stood the test of time. It is essential to a right understanding of God.
=============================================
You probably feel that this is an accurate statement, Bill.  There is a long shot possibility that you have nailed it, but another  reason why she cannot understand your viewpoint may very well be that you value your own opinion too highly and are actually in error.  After all, if you were correct, wouldn't David and I agree with you?
Terry

Reply via email to